Hi, OpenSSL folks,
I found some typos and other errors while reading through the
openssl.org web site. I've submitted suggested changes as a PR to the
openssl/web repo on GitHub. https://github.com/openssl/web/pull/8
Cheers,
Andrew Janke
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello.
Please find attached a patch to codingstyle.txt to fix some minor
grammatical errors and such trivialities.
Regards,
Aaron Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
OpenSSL 1.0.1 ciphers man page specifies "EECDHE" alias, the actual
alias supported by ciphers command is "EECDH".
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/405
--
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45,
fixed in mater with commit 0e04674. thanks!
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Hi,
I'm trying to build the FIPS-140 compliant OpenSSL software on my Windows 7
system using the Visual Studio 2015 compiler. I am using OpenSSL-FIPS-2.0.10
and OpenSSL-1.0.2d. I'm getting the following build error when trying to build
the 32-bit version of the OpenSSL libraries:
link /nologo
the real fix is to use OPENSSL_SYS_UNIX as the test.
Done in commit 568b80
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
On 16/09/15 16:15, John Foley wrote:
> Is the "Async support" you have listed the same code that Intel
> developed for Cave Creek? Or is the Intel contribution planned for a
> follow-on release?
It is all new code. However I have been developing it in collaboration
with Intel.
Matt
I see this fix will be in 1.0.1q. Do you know when 1.0.1q will be released?
Ian
-Original Message-
From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Matt
Caswell
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 8:40 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] TLS
> the real fix is to use OPENSSL_SYS_UNIX as the test.
> Done in commit 568b80
That seems to work!
I am still failing the rehash.t test:
../test/recipes/40-test_rehash.t .. 1/4
# Failed test 'Testing rehash operations on readonly directory'
# at ../test/recipes/40-test_rehash.t line
On 17/09/15 19:34, Ian McFadries (imcfadri) wrote:
> I see this fix will be in 1.0.1q. Do you know when 1.0.1q will be released?
We don't have a fixed timetable for bug fix releases. It is normally
driven by what ever security issues we have to respond to - so
unfortunately I don't know when
Wow, thanks for the thorough report. This was so broken that I had to go for a
pretty major rewrite. Please take a look at commits
3cdd1e94b1d71f2ce3002738f9506da91fe2af45 and
b785504a10310cb2872270eb409b70971be5e76e. (Also cherry-picked to 1.0.2 and
1.0.1.)
All your test cases now pass so I'm
$ apps/openssl$ openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev xx XXX
$ make test
testing...
make[1]: Entering directory `/media/uri/Src/openssl/test'
make[2]: Entering directory `/media/uri/Src/openssl'
making all in apps...
make[3]: Entering directory `/media/uri/Src/openssl/apps'
make[3]: Nothing to be
Since email re-opens the ticket, let's use this one :)
What's the output of this command:
HARNESS_VERBOSE=yes make 'TESTS=test_rehash' test
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Hmmm. I cannot reproduce this. Is anyone else seeing this?
Matt
On 17/09/15 20:15, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
> $ apps/openssl$ openssl version
> OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev xx XXX
> $ make test
> testing...
> make[1]: Entering directory `/media/uri/Src/openssl/test'
> make[2]: Entering
Thanks Rob! Resolving.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Hello,
see GitHub pull request at
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/404
This is like RT#4016, but for extended master secret.
Cheers
___
openssl-bugs-mod mailing list
openssl-bugs-...@openssl.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
