[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Would you try the attached patch, please? -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4326 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted diff --git a/config b/config index 77f730f..5213a0d 100755 --- a/config +++ b/config @@

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an > indicator? Yes, that seems to be the issue at hand for OpenSSL

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an > indicator? Yes, that seems to be the issue at hand for OpenSSL

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4328] Cygwin, self test and "./bctest: line 35: bc: command not found"

2016-02-20 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Truth is, the logic is a bit flawed, and it's not about those platform specific tests (which it shouldn't try on that first run). The correct conclusion right now is that you need to install 'bc' to be able to run the BIGNUM test Vid Sun, 21 Feb 2016 kl. 05.25.30, skrev noloa...@gmail.com: >

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an indicator? Cheers, Richard Vid Sun, 21 Feb 2016 kl. 04.33.17, skrev

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4328] Cygwin, self test and "./bctest: line 35: bc: command not found"

2016-02-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
Working on Windows under Cygwin-64: $ make test ... running bc ./bctest: line 35: bc: command not found bc does not work properly ('SunOStest' failed). Looking for another bc ... No working bc found. Consider installing GNU bc. 0 tests passed I'm reporting it because of the reference

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4327] SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() causes issues for SSL_CTX with multiple certs

2016-02-20 Thread TJ Saunders via RT
When the SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() function is used to configure custom TLS extension data (e.g. for SCT data), AND the SSL_CTX in question is configured for multiple server certificates, the SSL/TLS handshake can fail unexpectedly, and will not return the configured TLS extension data

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
After configuring on Windows 8.1/Core i5 4th gen machine, make'ing depend produces the following errors: $ make depend making depend in crypto... make[1]: Entering directory '/home/Test_User/openssl-1.0.2f/crypto' cc1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set cc1: error:

Re: [openssl-dev] Ubsec and Chil engines

2016-02-20 Thread Jaroslav Imrich
On 20 February 2016 at 21:40, Sander Temme wrote: > However, I’m intrigued by the notion of a PKCS#11 Engine in OpenSSL: it’s > a standard (an OASIS standard now); it’s fairly fully featured; everyone in > the industry supports it including Thales; and you can build a program

Re: [openssl-dev] Ubsec and Chil engines

2016-02-20 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <5b8f45ea-5867-4832-916a-6b31a323a...@temme.net> on Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:40:38 -0800, Sander Temme said: sander> sander> > On Feb 19, 2016, at 3:31 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: sander> sander> OK that made our support lines blow up so yes there is

Re: [openssl-dev] Ubsec and Chil engines

2016-02-20 Thread Sander Temme
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 3:31 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: OK that made our support lines blow up so yes there is interest. Disclaimer: I work for Thales but do not speak for Thales. > So it seems that for chil there may possibly be some rare use (but even > the most recent evidence

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4324] openssl-1.1.0-pre3 with solaris-x86-cc & solaris64-x86_64-cc make fails

2016-02-20 Thread Kiyoshi KANAZAWA via RT
Make fails with ./Configure solaris-x86-cc such as   : cc -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSLDIR=/opt/openssl/ssl -DENGINESDIR=/opt/openssl/lib/engines -KPIC -D_REENTRANT -xarch=generic -xstrconst -Xa -DL_ENDIAN -DFILIO_H -xO5 -xregs=frameptr -xdepend -xbuiltin

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4325] Unified Builds Don't Work With ARM

2016-02-20 Thread Kurt Cancemi via RT
Hello, There are a few problems that I am facing with unified builds with arm: 1. arm_arch.h is not in the include path. fatal error: arm_arch.h: No such file or directory 2. The arm assembler scripts output to stdout (see attached output.txt) I have a patch for aes-armv4.pl that fixes the

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4290] HMAC_Init_ex() return bug

2016-02-20 Thread Salz, Rich via RT
Still waiting to see from anyone else if it's a non-mac issue. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4290 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] Openssl SNAP 20160220 issues

2016-02-20 Thread The Doctor
Major shop stopper ../test/recipes/30-test_pbelu.t ... 1..1 ./pbelutest: can't load library 'ssl.so.1.1' not ok 1 - running pbelutest # Failed test 'running pbelutest' # at ../test/testlib/OpenSSL/Test/Simple.pm line 70. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. Dubious, test returned 1

Re: [openssl-dev] 20160220 repository

2016-02-20 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 01:57:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > Yes. Sorry about that, the disk space had filled out. It has been dealt with, > and the next snapshots will be whole. > > Cheers > Richard > > The Doctor skrev: (20 februari 2016 13:38:59 CET) >

Re: [openssl-dev] 20160220 repository

2016-02-20 Thread Richard Levitte
Yes. Sorry about that, the disk space had filled out. It has been dealt with, and the next snapshots will be whole. Cheers Richard The Doctor skrev: (20 februari 2016 13:38:59 CET) >Only Openssl 1.1 SNAP showed up. > >The other 2 choked off. -- Sent from my

[openssl-dev] 20160220 repository

2016-02-20 Thread The Doctor
Only Openssl 1.1 SNAP showed up. The other 2 choked off. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism