> That should work, however we are going to need to distinguish between
>
> Openssl < 1.1 and
>
> Openssl >= 1.1 duing the configuration run.
Looking at openssl/opensslv.h will let you figure it out and then have the
right #ifdef's.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.open
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:59:33PM +0100, Julien ÉLIE wrote:
> Hi The Doctor,
>
> >As of 2016-02-24 SSL_library_init may not be available in the libssl.so .
> >
> >Is there a workaround for this?
>
> Did you try OPENSSL_init_ssl()?
> According to the documentation
> https://www.openssl.org/docs
fixed with commit b5292f7 Thank you!
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4137
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/op
>>> /bin/as: Execution
>>> of /bin/compat-as/as failed with error code 0
>
> You're trying to cross compile? What is th target?
>
> How did you call Configure?
On related note, similar problem was reported earlier, see for example
https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/2015-June/001768.h
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:09:49AM -0800, Datta Prabhu Maddikunta wrote:
> > /bin/as: Execution
> > of /bin/compat-as/as failed with error code 0
You're trying to cross compile? What is th target?
How did you call Configure?
Kurt
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openss
Great! Closing now. Thank you.
Vid Ons, 24 Feb 2016 kl. 17.47.26, skrev levitte:
> If you're happy, I'm happy; it's that easy. If you think it's good,
> then it's
> time to close this ticket. You decide.
>
> Cheers,
> Richard
>
> Vid Ons, 24 Feb 2016 kl. 17.33.29, skrev beld...@gmail.com:
> > Dear
Well, I think the ticket may be closed.
Thank you!
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Richard Levitte via RT
wrote:
> If you're happy, I'm happy; it's that easy. If you think it's good, then
> it's
> time to close this ticket. You decide.
>
> Cheers,
> Richard
>
> Vid Ons, 24 Feb 2016 kl. 17.33.2
Well, I think the ticket may be closed.
Thank you!
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Richard Levitte via RT
wrote:
> If you're happy, I'm happy; it's that easy. If you think it's good, then
> it's
> time to close this ticket. You decide.
>
> Cheers,
> Richard
>
> Vid Ons, 24 Feb 2016 kl. 17.33.2
If you're happy, I'm happy; it's that easy. If you think it's good, then it's
time to close this ticket. You decide.
Cheers,
Richard
Vid Ons, 24 Feb 2016 kl. 17.33.29, skrev beld...@gmail.com:
> Dear Richard,
>
> The patch you suggested seems not to break at least self-compatibility for
> the smi
Dear Richard,
The patch you suggested seems not to break at least self-compatibility for
the smime -enc command.
Is this enough or should I do some more tests?
Thank you!
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky
wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
> Sorry for the delay. I am out of office now s
The Doctor wrote:
As of 2106-20-24 SSL_librbary_init may not be avialable in the libssl.so .
Wow, did you really come back 90 years in your TARDIS just to tell us this?
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Reposting on openssl-dev for some solution.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Datta Prabhu Maddikunta
Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Assembly code errors while building openssl-1.0.2f on Ubuntu
14.04
To: openssl-us...@openssl.org
Hi Team,
>
> I am trying to build '
Matt Caswell wrote:
> The complete patch is attached. This is currently going through review,
> and solves the link issue.
That brought MSVC-2015 back on track. Thanks!
--
--gv
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
As of 2106-20-24 SSL_librbary_init may not be avialable in the libssl.so .
Is their a workaround for this?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me
Hi,
I have PR https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/739 with the below
changes, please have a look.
- In EC_KEY_priv2buf(), check for pbuf sanity.
- If invoked with NULL, gracefully returns the key length.
Thanks,
Mohan
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4343
Plea
Hi,
I have the below mentioned changes in the PR:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/740, please have a look.
BIO_ADDR_new, ossl_hmac_init, b64_new, ok_new, pkey_hmac_init:
- added missing checks for malloc return value.
EC_KEY_new_method, ossl_hmac_copy, dane_ctx_enable:
- releasin
On 24/02/16 10:29, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>> The attached seems to avoid the problem - but then for reasons I cannot
>> understand link errors result later on in the build.
>
> I too can confirm that your patch fixes MSVC-2105 compilation.
> Thanks a million!
>
> But as you
Matt Caswell wrote:
> The attached seems to avoid the problem - but then for reasons I cannot
> understand link errors result later on in the build.
I too can confirm that your patch fixes MSVC-2105 compilation.
Thanks a million!
But as you wrote, the link fails. Due to util/mkdef.pl needs
an up
Forwarded Message
From: Robert Relyea
To: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Cc: openssl-dev@openss
l.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] Ubsec and Chil engines
Date: Tue, 23 Feb
2016 12:28:25 -0500 (EST)
- Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 15:08 +0100, Jaroslav Imric
19 matches
Mail list logo