> On Feb 27, 2016, at 7:42 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> Please ensure this is documented somewhere. I'm having trouble finding
> information on the new rules.
>
> There's 15 or 20 years of using capitol and lower case identifiers to
> denote public and private APIs with OpenSSL. For example, s
>> Correct me if I am wrong... API's that start with capitol letters are
>> public. Private interfaces use lowercase letters.
>> Documented/undocumented does not really factor things.
>
> You're wrong. Once OpenSSL's past sins are remediated, public
> interfaces are precisely those that are docume
commit e0b5108; thanks.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4354
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Stack Overflow has a number of questions related to mutual
authentication, the client and its certificate. Those visiting the man
pages for functions like SSL_CTX_use_certificate and
SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations don't receive the benefit of a cross
reference to SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list.
This pa
and the apps are converted to use that function (BIO_sock_nbio) , so fully
closing this :)
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2275
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To un
Hmm...
% make libcrypto.so.1.0.0 libssl.so.1.0.0
always remakes them.
It is better to change Makefile in top, but too complicated for me.
Easier sample patch is as follows.
diff -cr ../openssl-1.0.2f.orig/crypto/Makefile ./crypto/Makefile
*** ../openssl-1.0.2f.orig/crypto/Makefile 2016-01-28 2
Hmm...
% make libcrypto.so.1.0.0 libssl.so.1.0.0
always remakes them.
It is better to change Makefile in top, but too complicated for me.
Easier sample patch is as follows.
diff -cr ../openssl-1.0.2f.orig/crypto/Makefile ./crypto/Makefile
*** ../openssl-1.0.2f.orig/crypto/Makefile 2016-01-28 2
There are dependency error in Makefile(s).
SHARED_LIBS are checked in . but make will be run in ..
crypto/Makefile:
108 shared: buildinf.h lib subdirs
109 if [ -n "$(SHARED_LIBS)" ]; then \
110 (cd ..; $(MAKE) $(SHARED_LIB)); \
111 fi
ssl/Makefile:
63 shared:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 01:58:26AM +, noloa...@gmail.com via RT wrote:
> Platform is Linux, x86_64. The failure occurs under Clang with the
> sanitizer. GCC is fine.
>
> I'm guessing the error output from the Undefined Behavior sanitizer is
> causing the test to be interpreted as a fail.
It h