Hi Shruti,
As per openssl, version 0.98e is not infected with hearbleed issue. You can
check on below link.
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt
Regards,
Lokesh Jangir
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Shruti Palshikar shr...@buysidefx.comwrote:
Thanks everyone for the help, does
restarted
apache service and server many times after installation.
But still it is showing my website vulnerable. Can you please guide me what
am i missing now ?
Thanks and Regards,
Lokesh Jangir
)
libdl.so.2 = /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x7ff2d5c41000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7ff2d7a09000)
libuuid.so.1 = /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x7ff2d5a3c000)
libfreebl3.so = /lib64/libfreebl3.so (0x7ff2d57c6000)
Please have a look and help me.
Regards,
Lokesh Jangir
Hi Rainer,
Yes, apache was running with the old library, i have moved this out, and
copied new libssl library from new openssl installation folder. But it is
not working and now i am unable to start apache.
Now what to do with this ?
Regards,
Lokesh Jangir
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:52 PM
folder and rename
this as .so ?
Regards,
Lokesh Jangir
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Fedor Indutny fe...@indutny.com wrote:
So, considering that it fails to start now. Could you please verify that
`ls -la /lib64/libcrypt.so.1` is still valid?
Fedor.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:53 PM
-s /path/to/new/libcrypto.so.1
/lib64/libcrypt.so.1`
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:13 PM, LOKESH JANGIR lk.jangi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Fedor,
Yes i did not move this file out. and i can see the output of ls -la
/lib64/libcrypt.so.1
libcrypt.so - ../../lib64/libcrypt.so.1
...@iam.tj wrote:
On 14/04/14 10:42, LOKESH JANGIR wrote:
I am using Ubuntu, Amazon ami with apache 2.0 and mod_ssl installed. I
The oldest still-supported Ubuntu version - 10.04 Lucid Lynx - ships with:
apache2.2-bin (2.2.14-5ubuntu8.13) [security]
Hi Fedor,
Thanks for the reply. My httpd
