I suggest you remove all files in include/openssl/, then rebuild.
The reason for your problem is that the distribution contains a bunch
of symlinks, like this:
lrwxrwxrwx openssl/openssl 0 2011-02-08 18:13
openssl-1.0.0d/include/openssl/opensslconf.h - ../../crypto/opensslconf.h
On
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:17:00 +0200 (CEST),
Dhaval Rao via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Platform: OpenVMS
rt Query: I can see that OpenSSL could be built on
rt OpenVMS Alpha VAX.
rt Is OpenSSL supported on OpenVMS Itanium (IA64)
rt platform. If not, could you
I just kicked out Vasco Ribeiro from openssl-dev because of these
repeated vacation messages.
Vasco, as soon as you have either closed or educated your vacation
program, you're welcome to resubscribe to the openssl-dev list.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free
Applied with a twist (On VMS, time.h defines select(), according to
docs. Why? Beats me) and committed.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Richard
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:33:04 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Hi,
vinschen
vinschen building apps/ocsp.c
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:34:23 -0800, Kees Cook
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kees 3 years ago, I wrote a patch[1] (and did the TSU[2]) for adding
kees these features to s_client. Can this please be applied to CVS?
Yes. Done. Thank you, and sorry you had to wait 3 years
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:42:50 +0100, Vincenzo
Sciarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vincenzo.sciarra I have just published a pre-alfa of a patch that has the goal
to make
vincenzo.sciarra OpenSSH aware with PMI.
vincenzo.sciarra
vincenzo.sciarra Reference site :
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:59:19 -0800, David
Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
davids You are correct, but that's not the issue. The issue is this
davids simple -- if you are going to call a function whose types you
davids don't know (through a prototype), you must cast
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:18:36 -0400, Brad House
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
brad Personally I'd prefer something truly cross-platform like CMake.
I wholeheartedly agree, and would be willing to spend time
implementing that, together with others.
Cheers,
Richard
-
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:47:07 +1000, Erik de
Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mle+openssl Well, it seems that the list manager is somewhat confused.
mle+openssl
mle+openssl From my work account I did which [EMAIL PROTECTED] which resulted
mle+openssl in:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:09:27 -0500 (CDT), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
marquess John and I are already being asked what happens next. At
marquess this point we don't know, but we haven't necessarily given
marquess up. As we learn more I'll pass on our findings here.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:40:01 -0400, Richard Salz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rsalz I propose that OpenSSL move to DocBook, an XML format, for its
rsalz documentation.
I agree completely. This was actually brought up a while ago by
someone else (was that Dave Pawson,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:51:53 +0100, Dave
Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dave.pawson http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/funcparams.html
dave.pawson
dave.pawson Is that any help?
That's what I've tried, and it seems like it doesn't add the
parenthesis it should. I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:15:59 +0200, Jan
Pazdziora [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jpr-ossl The primary concern is a change in API/ABI, namely removal of three
jpr-ossl functions: BIO_get_host_ip, BIO_get_port, and BIO_gethostbyname. They
jpr-ossl are not documented in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:39:22 +0200, Jan
Pazdziora [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jpr-ossl On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:32:50PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker wrote:
jpr-ossl In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:15:59 +0200,
Jan Pazdziora [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:59:18 +0200, Jan
Pazdziora [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jpr-ossl OK. I suggest I prepare a patch that will not change them (they will
jpr-ossl be IPv4-only), will mark them with #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED, and
jpr-ossl will not add them to the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:11:30 +0100, Darryl Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
darryl-mailinglists Mikhail Gusarov via RT wrote:
darryl-mailinglists Failing testcase is attached (pass rsa key as first
argument)
darryl-mailinglists
darryl-mailinglists FYI: Attachment
OK, I'm applying it.
I made one little change though, assuming the condition in the
following part was meant to be 'defined(FD_SETSIZE)'...:
+#else
+ /* lets use select() */
[...]
+ #if defined(OPENSSL_SYS_LINUX)
+ #define IOWAIT_FD_SETSIZE (FD_SETSIZE)
+ #else
+ /* fallback method */
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:53:06 +0200 (CEST),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
richard OK, I'm applying it.
Hmm, someone beat me to it, at least on 0.9.9-dev... :-)
Cheers,
RIchard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:27:51 -0700 (PDT),
Josephin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
j_suganthi Hi,
j_suganthiWhen I'm renewing a certificate, if I'm changing
j_suganthi the OU and L (location), will that certificate will be
j_suganthi treated as a new certificate?
When
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 25 May 2006 22:50:15 -0700 (PDT), Alex
Dubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
oakad I thought all major compilers have sort of long long,
oakad didn't them? After all, emulated long long is still
oakad only two integer xors as opposed to 8 with char.
If you look in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 16 May 2006 10:17:35 -0500, Matt England
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mengland At 5/16/2006 09:55 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
mengland More importantely, as the ssleay license is more
mengland free (less restrictive) than the gpl it allows for
mengland OpenSSL's
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:27:27 -0400, Richard Salz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rsalz As for BSD/advertising dicussions, the SSLeay license is
rsalz characterized as BSD with copyright. It's not pure BSD, and
rsalz so whether or not the current BSD license has an
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 16 May 2006 14:31:46 -0700, David
Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
davids
davids In message
davids [EMAIL PROTECTED]
davids com on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:27:27 -0400, Richard Salz
davids [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
davids
davids rsalz As for BSD/advertising
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 12 May 2006 16:57:58 +0200, Gisle Vanem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
giva With the following patch I'm able to link openssl.exe using the DLL
giva (and not the static libs):
Did a make update. There were more symbols missing and some other
stuff to correct. The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:05:38 +0100, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Stefan.Neis Is the patch tested on windows ?
Stefan.Neis z modifier - I'm not sure that this is portable.
Stefan.Neis
Stefan.Neis if I remember correctly windows doesn't support this
Stefan.Neis
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:07:37 +0100, Dr. Uwe
Girlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Uwe.Girlich I know this but reading the mailing list archive of
Uwe.Girlich openssl-dev@openssl.org, it looks like some members of
Uwe.Girlich the OpenSSL community already did this and I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:35:51 -0800, nagendra
modadugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nagendra diff -u -r1.5 pqueue.c
nagendra --- crypto/pqueue/pqueue.c 7 Jun 2005 22:21:14 - 1.5
nagendra +++ crypto/pqueue/pqueue.c 20 Dec 2005 01:48:27 -
nagendra @@
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:46:11 +0100, Johan Gill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
johane Johan Gill wrote:
johane Hi, here's one more cleanup prior to my larger patch:
johane Remove the inclusion of sys/times.h from crypto/rand/rand_unix.c.
johane
johane Any issues with
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:45:15 +0530, Pradosh Adoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pradosh.adoni so ,would it make more sense to standardize on the EVP
pradosh.adoni interface as opposed to the lower level functions ?
pradosh.adoni This would force developers seeking LSB
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:37:19 +0100, Dr. Stephen
Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
steve As for incompatible chanhes there is one nasty incompatibility
steve with PKCS#11 which EVP might have to address if we ever need a
steve full PKCS#11 ENGINE. Even that though could
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:00:17 +0100, Dr. Stephen
Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
steve The other is that its equivalent to EVP_CipherUpdate() and
steve EVP_CipherFinal() which can output data in arbitrary sizes
steve whereas our stuff will never be more than one block
[Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket
database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte]
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it
[Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket
database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte]
[And I did it wrong the first time. Appologies for the dupliactes]
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100 (CET),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
richard [Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket
richard database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte]
I did it wrong. Sorry
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:27:30 +, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kent At work I use SVN.
kent It's much better then CVS (IMHO).
kent
kent When will OPENSSL move to SVN?
Personally, I'd rather it moved to monotone
(http://www.venge.net/monotone/). SVN
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:49:53 +0530, Pradosh
Adoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pradosh.adoni though it has been fairly established that the
pradosh.adoni resulting ABI will in all probabilty break in
pradosh.adoni forthcoming (major) versions, It would be good to know
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:01:23 -0400, Johnny Lam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jlam What makes you think that the OpenSSL developers will go to the
jlam trouble to do all this major surgery to their codebase when they
jlam won't do the very simple thing of just properly
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:32:19 +0530, Dharmesh
Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dharmesh.mail I am a new user of openssl, and started exploring
dharmesh.mail opensssl few days back. I am running the test (make
dharmesh.mail test) and generating the report. I was analysing
[Additional note to get the proposal itself into this ticket's history]
From: Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:24:58 +0200
Subject: Proposal for symbol versioning of openssl
Hi folks,
openssl has evolved to a very important library in Linux distribution. A
lot of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:17:08 +0200, Goetz
Babin-Ebell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
goetz Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
goetz
goetz OpenSSL version 0.9.7i released
goetz ===
goetz
goetz OpenSSL 0.9.7h caused crashes when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.7i released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL 0.9.7h caused crashes when the shared libcrypto was
upgraded. This release fixes that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:51:13 +0200, Andy
Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
appro 1. One can cook some #ifdef spaghetti in dso_dlfcn.c [and
approothers as required].
appro 2. One can fix affected link_o targets to adhere to suffix
approhardcoded in
Kamalesh Nandi via RT writes:
I was trying to build openssl-0.9.7e in Windows Visual Studio 2005 Beta2
Environment. I was getting an error. But the same openssl-0.9.7e builds fine
in Windows Visual Studio 2003 Environment. Is there any additional steps to
be performed specific to Visual
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:00:57 -0700, Ryan
Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ryan-openssl The specification states (10.1.2) that the data encoding
ryan-openssl method includes a digestAlgorithmIdentifier and our
ryan-openssl testing house says that this constant is
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:20:32 +0200, Dr. Stephen
Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
steve On Wed, Jul 27, 2005, Frdric Donnat wrote:
steve
steve But i did not have a look at 0.9.7 snapshot (my mistake).
steve In the snapshot directory, what are
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:01:24 -0700 (PDT), dean
gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dean On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dean
dean Unless I do the following I get the Meaningless use of exression
dean from the compiler:
dean
dean diff -ru
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:01:11 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen The problem only happens on filesystems which are not
vinschen case-sensitive but only case-preserving, like filesystems on
vinschen Windows or MacOS.
vinschen
vinschen What happens
I'm starting the release of 0.9.8. Hold ye' horses.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 released
==
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.8 of our open
Can anyone tell me why the hell CA.pl puts both the private key and
the CSR in newreq.pem? Shouldn't they be *separate*?
I'm baffled.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 4 Jul 2005 22:29:54 +0200, Dr. Stephen
Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
steve On Mon, Jul 04, 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
steve
steve Can anyone tell me why the hell CA.pl puts both the private
steve key and the CSR in newreq.pem? Shouldn't
OK,
I want to know if there's anything more for me to worry about, or can
I release 0.9.8 tonight?
You have 12 hours (until 19:30, GMT+0200) to try to stop me :-). If I
receive no message saying I should release 0.9.8, I will at that time.
That means the developers also have that time to fix
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:44:38 -0700, Banginwar,
Rajesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rajesh.banginwar Do you or anyone on this project have data
rajesh.banginwar suggesting which APIs are candidates for LSB
rajesh.banginwar inclusion both from demand and stability point of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:05:07 -0700, Dan Kegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dank http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/
dank exposes two APIs: the OpenSSL api (I gather?), and its own.
About the OpenSSL API, this page answers part of the question.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:26:38 +0200, Nils Larsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nlarsch asn1parse doesn't support txt input just der or pem
The help says it does. I'll fix that.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See
Ben,
you committed four non-FIPS changes to 0.9.8-stable only. Are you
going to commit them to HEAD as well?
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:27:53 +0200 (CEST), Ben
Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ben Log:
ben Did you know it was wrong to use a char as an array index?
It isn't if you know what you're doing. However, when things like
isspace() are implemented using an array,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:29:54 -0700, Rodney
Thayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rodney 'make test' never works. in the EC test, it runs a long time
rodney (tracing the output gives multiple gigabytes of text, it seems
rodney to take on the order of an hour or more). the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:42:59 +0200, Karsten Ohme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
widerstand will there be some day, when the the OpenSSL source code
widerstand is documented in a some way? In all source files,
widerstand explanations to the functions, the parameters and
Hi,
The release is delayed again. There are a couple of issues that I
think need to be checked. I hope we'll be through with this in a
week.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:30:40 -0700, nagendra
modadugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nagendra It turns out that the Version field was omitted from the
nagendra HelloVerify message in the internet draft. The document
nagendra will be corrected.
So the bug report can be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:50:53 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen On Jun 24 14:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
vinschen
vinschen The OpenSSL 0.9.8-stable snapshot from 24 June 2005 configures,
vinschen builds, tests, and installs without
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:58:29 -0700, Rush Manbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rush Just tried again with 20050624 snapshot. It built just fine and
rush successfully ran all the tests.
Great! Thanks! Noted.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:57:14 -0400, Green,
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Paul.Green I've built and run the self-tests for
Paul.Green openssl-SNAP-20050624.tar.gz on Stratus VOS, using gcc, on
Paul.Green both hardware platforms (PA-RISC and Intel IA32). Works
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:25:12 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen On Jun 21 08:21, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
vinschen -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
vinschen Hash: SHA1
vinschen
vinschen
vinschenOpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:04:17 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Any problem to apply the below last minute patch to util/cygwin.sh?
No. I'll see to it.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:57:29 +1000, Steven
Reddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
smr Operating system Configured for Compiler
smr --- --
smr -
smr Windows 2000
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:03:32 +0200 (CEST), Andy
Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
appro OpenSSL CVS Repository
appro http://cvs.openssl.org/
appro
appro
appro Server:
Hi all,
Due to a number of last minute reports, the final release of OpenSSL
0.9.8 is delayed a few days to give the affected people a chance to
test that the corrections done do fix things as expeted.
So please, if you have sent in a report about something failing with
one of the 0.9.8 betas,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:02:55 +0200, Steffen
Pankratz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kratz00 Hi
kratz00
kratz00 from the enc man page - SUPPORTED CIPHERS
kratz00
kratz00 rc5-cbcRC5 cipher in CBC mode
kratz00 rc5 Alias for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 6 (FINAL!)
=
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The sixth beta is now
released. The beta
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:11:30 +0200, Beat Jucker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bj Given attached BASE64 encoded file openssl will write only 5280
bj decoded bytes instead of the original 5305 bytes as other tools
bj like mimencode, base64, Asn1Editor, web online base64
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:52:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim
Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tim I noticed make report didn't show the cc version on most of
tim my System V platforms. This patch corrects this.
Thanks, committed.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:53:39 +0200, Dr. Stephen
Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
steve On Mon, Jun 20, 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
steve
steve In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:11:30 +0200,
Beat Jucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
steve
Hi,
I've just remade the release schedule a little bit. Originally,
OpenSSL 0.9.8 was supposed to be released yesterday. However, due to
personal stuff and some issues with the latest beta, the release has
been slightly delayed.
So, the final beta will be this evening (Swedish time), and the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:03:06 -0700 (PDT), Doug
Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dkaufman You are quite correct, in that quoting DEVRANDOM was the wrong thing
dkaufman to do. It put the string DEVRANDOM into the library instead of the
dkaufman value of DEVRANDOM. I am
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:41:03 +0900 (JST), GOTOU
Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
gotoyuzo `Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]' wrote:
gotoyuzo In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:38:27 +0900
(JST
I'm delaying the release of 0.9.8 beta6 until tomorrow (friday) night.
The reason is that I want to test some changes on systems that may be
sensitive to them before releasing. I believe that will be better for
the release process as a whole.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:37:15 +0900 (JST), GOTOU
Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo Hi,
gotoyuzo
gotoyuzo Compilation of ssl/kssl.c fails on NetBSD 3.99.5.
gotoyuzo
gotoyuzo gcc -I../crypto -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -pthread
-D_THREAD_SAFE
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:38:27 +0900 (JST), GOTOU
Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo It may be an issue of NetBSD, but #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE
gotoyuzo seems a little wrong too.
Does it work if I remove the #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE? I had it there for
paranoid reasons,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:16:03 -0400, Mike
Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vapier On Monday 13 June 2005 12:19 am, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
vapierOpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 5
vapier
vapier `./config make make test` passed on Gentoo/armel
Which
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:03:10 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen On Jun 13 18:59, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
vinschen In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:57:10 +0200,
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 5
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The fifth beta is now
released. The beta release is available for
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:28:27 +, Eduardo Pérez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
eperez On 2005-05-14 15:27:26 +, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
eperez I was wondering if openssl-0.9.8 is going to be API/ABI
eperez compatible with the current stable branch of openssl-0.9.7
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:32:52 +0200, Andy
Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
appro appro 1. I'm reluctant to include bn.h to non-bn code, because it's
appro appronothing but counterintuitive [and is not good in long run].
appro appro 2. My standpoint is [still]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 08 Jun 2005 06:16:54 +0200 (CEST),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
richard In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:32:52 +0200,
Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
richard
richard appro appro 1. I'm reluctant to include
It's interesting to see this happening. We have two parts of OpenSSL,
sha512 and pqueue, that solve the 64-bit integer problem in very
different manners.
Would it be a bad thing to have a header file in crypto/bn that
provides a guaranteed 64-bit number, possibly through BIGNUM, with
macros to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:32:05 +0200, Andy
Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
appro 1. I'm reluctant to include bn.h to non-bn code, because it's
appronothing but counterintuitive [and is not good in long run].
appro 2. My standpoint is [still] that pqueue/dtls1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 06 Jun 2005 09:39:51 +1000 (EST), Brian
Havard [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
brianh There's a few other places where VMS is specifically tested for related
to
brianh this that probably should also be changed.
brianh
brianh IE ./ssl/d1_pkt.c:139,1456,1741
brianh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 4
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The fourth beta is now
released. The beta release is available
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 4 Jun 2005 04:31:21 +0200 (CEST),
Andrija Antonijevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
openssl I am using OpenSSL on an architecture that has a shared
openssl library model in which the arguments are passed through the
openssl (32-bit) registers and for which passing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 3
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The third beta is now
released. The beta release is available for
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 26 May 2005 21:29:25 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
geoff Eek, I've incurred the wrath of the Cult Of Strange Platforms
geoff In Denial ... :-)
*g*
geoff I have no problems with a name change of the sort. In the
geoff VMS case, I doubt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 May 2005 23:16:11 -0400, Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
geoff Richard, any idea of how safe it would be to change the names
geoff of the two shared librariesy at this stage of the 0.9.8 betas?
geoff I'm reluctant to charge ahead for fear of breaking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 2
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now
released. The beta release is available
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 21 May 2005 19:21:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim
Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tim On Fri, 20 May 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
tim
tim In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 19 May 2005 22:14:20 -0700 (PDT),
Tim Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tim
tim Hmm
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 20 May 2005 14:45:01 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Sorry for a possibly dumb question, but I don't quite
vinschen understand the engines concept. Is there a good reason that
vinschen the engine shared libs are created w/o version
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 20 May 2005 18:32:47 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Ok, below is a patch which should solve the problems on
vinschen Cygwin. It tweaks Makefile.org, Makefile.shared,
vinschen engines/Makefile and util/cygwin.sh.
Applied.
Cheers,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 21 May 2005 19:11:20 +0200, Corinna
Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen What about my question:
vinschen
vinschen What I'm not sure about is, if the engines shouldn't
vinschen better be installed into /usr/bin. Otherwise they are
vinschen only
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 21 May 2005 10:07:23 -0700 (PDT), David
Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dwolfe5272 I suspect that no other platforms would break if this
dwolfe5272 change were made in the OpenSSL sources, as this seems to
dwolfe5272 be the standard-mandated behavior:
1 - 100 of 1732 matches
Mail list logo
