> That's a lot of bang for the buck...
Wow, it certainly is! Thanks.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
>> > $ git diff include/openssl/lhash.h
>> > diff --git a/include/openssl/lhash.h b/include/openssl/lhash.h index
>> > 2edd738..5da5054 100644
>> > --- a/include/openssl/lhash.h
>> > +++ b/include/openssl/lhash.h
>> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ void lh_node_usage_stats_bio(const _LHASH *lh, BIO
>> > *out)
>> > $ git diff include/openssl/lhash.h
>> > diff --git a/include/openssl/lhash.h b/include/openssl/lhash.h index
>> > 2edd738..5da5054 100644
>> > --- a/include/openssl/lhash.h
>> > +++ b/include/openssl/lhash.h
>> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ void lh_node_usage_stats_bio(const _LHASH *lh, BIO
>> > *out)
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 06:41:34PM +, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> This looks like a good change.
>
> > This clears what looks to be hundreds of alignment related warnings like
> > below.
> >
> > $ git diff include/openssl/lhash.h
> > diff --git a/include/openssl/lhash.h b/include/openssl/lhas
This looks like a good change.
> This clears what looks to be hundreds of alignment related warnings like
> below.
>
> $ git diff include/openssl/lhash.h
> diff --git a/include/openssl/lhash.h b/include/openssl/lhash.h index
> 2edd738..5da5054 100644
> --- a/include/openssl/lhash.h
> +++ b/includ
