On 03/06/16 12:19, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 03/06/16 10:52, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
Hi Matt,
thanks for the suggested API and code. Please find below a suggested
patch that implements this new callback.
the patch is based on 1.0.2-dev from GIT:
url:
On 03/06/16 10:52, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> thanks for the suggested API and code. Please find below a suggested
> patch that implements this new callback.
>
>
> the patch is based on 1.0.2-dev from GIT:
>
> url: git://git.openssl.org/openssl.git
> branch:
On 02/06/16 16:03, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 02/06/16 14:33, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
On 01/06/16 13:58, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 01/06/16 11:15, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
hi,
we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our
product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation
On 02/06/16 14:33, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/16 13:58, Matt Caswell wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/06/16 11:15, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our
>>> product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation works really well
On 01/06/16 13:58, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 01/06/16 11:15, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
hi,
we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our
product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation works really well
and is very robust. We are using OpenSSL version 1.0.2g
since our
On 01/06/16 11:15, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
> hi,
>
> we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our
> product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation works really well
> and is very robust. We are using OpenSSL version 1.0.2g
>
>
> since our product is deployed globally on
hi,
we are using DTLS from OpenSSL to implement DTLS-SRTP in our
product (Wire.com) .. The code and implementation works really well
and is very robust. We are using OpenSSL version 1.0.2g
since our product is deployed globally on mobile data networks,
we have quite variable latency and
