Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

2016-03-21 Thread Michel
Hi Jeff, In case it may still be usefull, I have updated the patch against today's git repo. I was able to build OpenSSL VC-WIN32 configured with no-nextprotoneg option. Regards, Michel. no-nextproto-1.1.0.patch Description: Binary data -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://m

Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

2016-03-21 Thread Michel
l-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] De la part de Jeffrey Walton Envoyé : lundi 21 mars 2016 09:42 À : OpenSSL Developer ML Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option? On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: > Ye

Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

2016-03-21 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: > Yes, there is such a configuration option: no-nextprotoneg > Thank you very much. That leads to: gcc -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_NO_DYNAMIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSS

Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

2016-03-21 Thread Richard Levitte
Yes, there is such a configuration option: no-nextprotoneg In message on Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:47:33 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said: noloader> Is no-npn a supported configuration option for 1.1.0? noloader> noloader> Its causing a test script to fail: noloader> noloader> Testing no next protocol n

[openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

2016-03-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
Is no-npn a supported configuration option for 1.1.0? Its causing a test script to fail: Testing no next protocol negotiation Operating system: x86_64-whatever-linux2 Configuring for linux-x86_64 Configuring OpenSSL version 1.1.0-pre5-dev (0x0x1015L) * Unsupported options: no-npn FAILED