[jaenicke - Fri Oct 19 11:39:05 2007]:
This will never be fixed in the 0.9.8f tarball (as it was rolled as is).
OpenSSL 0.9.8g has now been released using a correct version code.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL
Your statement is actually correct. Nevertheless it does not seem to be
useful to create
a new release (0.9.8g) just to correct an informational version number
code. It also
would not be a good idea to create a new tarball with the same name but
just a new
version number code.
We have therefore
include/openssl/opensslv.h has:
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x00908070L
Shouldn't this be:
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x0090806fL
since this is the 6th patch _release_, not dev?
--
Matt
__
OpenSSL Project
