There is no assembly support for pe64.
Well, Win64 ABI is fully supported by OpenSSL x86_64 assembler modules.
There is no support for GNU assembler under Win64, but masm (rather
known as ml64) and nasm are fully supported (though there are
requirements for least supported versions, for
Hello,
appro added assembly support for mingw64 at [1].
I've succeeded in compiling this with the following patch.
Thank you!
Alon.
[1] http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17619
---
--- openssl-SNAP-20081113/Configure 2008-11-12 22:00:07.0 +0200
+++
Alon Bar-Lev via RT wrote:
On 10/31/08, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please test the other suggested bn_lcl.h modification? While
you're on it...
[SNIP]
Attached is a new patch.
Thanks!
Alon.
Why mingw64 ... -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x333 ?
This has to defined by
On 11/3/08, Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why mingw64 ... -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x333 ?
This has to defined by openssl headers (if not defined) to 0x400.
HEAD version is for winsock2 and I'm not sure that winsock2 is available as
example for ancient nt3.51. The winsock2 library is
Could you please test the other suggested bn_lcl.h modification? While
you're on it...
I cannot actually test it... I can compile and users may test.
I don't have a win64 machine.
How is it tested? Implicitly by an application being inter-operable with
another? Meaning that only only part
On 11/1/08, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please test the other suggested bn_lcl.h modification? While
you're on it...
I cannot actually test it... I can compile and users may test.
I don't have a win64 machine.
How is it tested? Implicitly by an
I managed to produce them myself with
mingw-w64-bin_x86-64-linux_20080921.tar.bz2. Modified sha512.c is fine,
Great!
My environment is gcc-4.3.2, binutils-CVS-head, mingw-w64-SVN-head as
20080921 is equipped with gcc-4.4.0 and whatever the rest it is equipped
with.
modified bn_lcl.h
Great!
Can you commit the mingw64 other stuff?
On 11/1/08, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I managed to produce them myself with
mingw-w64-bin_x86-64-linux_20080921.tar.bz2. Modified sha512.c is fine,
Great!
My environment is gcc-4.3.2, binutils-CVS-head,
Could you please test the other suggested bn_lcl.h modification? While
you're on it...
I am not fully sure that the crypto/sha/sha512.c is correct, it
simulate the behavior of win64 using Microsoft compiler, using
_rotr64 function as ROTR.
What you should have done instead is to modify macro
On 10/31/08, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please test the other suggested bn_lcl.h modification? While
you're on it...
I cannot actually test it... I can compile and users may test.
I don't have a win64 machine.
And I don't know how exactly I can check for speed...
I
Hello,
Attached is latest mingw win64 patch for OpenSSL.
It is verified to work with the OpenSC project and the OpenVPN project using
cross compile from Linux machine using binutils CVS head, gcc-4.3.2 and
mingw-w64 svn head.
There is no assembly support for pe64. So no assembly is
There is no assembly support for pe64.
Well, Win64 ABI is fully supported by OpenSSL x86_64 assembler modules.
There is no support for GNU assembler under Win64, but masm (rather
known as ml64) and nasm are fully supported (though there are
requirements for least supported versions, for nasm
On Thursday 30 October 2008, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
There is no assembly support for pe64.
Well, Win64 ABI is fully supported by OpenSSL x86_64 assembler modules.
There is no support for GNU assembler under Win64, but masm (rather
known as ml64) and nasm are fully supported (though
Hello,
Attached is a new version, against latest snapshot.
I don't know how the -DOPENSSL_USE_APPLINK works for you guys... It produces
invalid asm for me...
I don't fully understand what this file do...
perl ../ms/uplink.pl coff uplink-cof.s
x86_64-pc-mingw32-gcc -I. -I.. -I../include
The alarm() will be removed:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2182468group_id=202880atid=983354
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- windows.h apparently includes wincrypt.h (no idea whether that's
specific to that compiler, but it seems so ...), so I needed to
#undefine a couple of names messed up by wincrypt.h
(patches to rand.h,
Ger Hobbelt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- windows.h apparently includes wincrypt.h (no idea whether that's
specific to that compiler, but it seems so ...), so I needed to
#undefine a couple of names messed up by wincrypt.h
Andy Polyakov wrote:
How do we know that these are not or should not be treated as mingw64
bugs? I mean it worked for mingw for years (I wonder how by the way),
now ancestor is *being developed* and how come it's not its fault:-)
I don't really understand that part about ancestor, but never
How do we know that these are not or should not be treated as mingw64
bugs? I mean it worked for mingw for years (I wonder how by the way),
now ancestor is *being developed* and how come it's not its fault:-)
I don't really understand that part about ancestor, but never mind ...
Oops! I
Here's a patch against today's snapshot of head.
I think that you has to compile with -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN in
Configure before to do some undefs in openssl headers.
I'm not really convinced, but for the time being, I've added that
compile
option to get rid of that more or less cosmetic
Hi,
Please, could you propose a patch to the OpenSSL head.
In the head -lwsock32 is replaced by -lws2_32.
Will do..
I think that you has to compile with -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN in
Configure
before to do some undefs in openssl headers. Also see other win64
targets.
But doesn't
Hi,
Please, could you propose a patch to the OpenSSL head.
In the head -lwsock32 is replaced by -lws2_32.
Here's a patch against today's snapshot of head.
I think that you has to compile with -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN in
Configure before to do some undefs in openssl headers.
Hi Stefan,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
Hi,
I just tried to compile OpenSSL-0.9.8h with mingw-w64 (see
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/) and needed a couple
of changes to the source code (see attached patch).
Some notes:
- I added a mingw64 line to Configure and
Hi,
I just tried to compile OpenSSL-0.9.8h with mingw-w64 (see
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/) and needed a couple
of changes to the source code (see attached patch).
Some notes:
- I added a mingw64 line to Configure and (think I) told it to use
.exe
extension for
24 matches
Mail list logo