Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-11-08 Thread Andy Polyakov
> Doing something like AES-GCM with the AES in the engine and GCM Hash in > OpenSSL though I'd expect to see an impact, you are basically doingthe AES > a blcok at a time in that sceenario. Just for reference. This is kind of bad example, because OpenSSL GCM implementation allows to deploy stream

Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-11-07 Thread Peter Waltenberg
te: 08/11/2011 05:00 Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL Sent by:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org Peter Waltenberg wrote: > There are some fairly severe performance hits in engine support unless the > engine includes all the submodes as well. > That i

Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-11-07 Thread Andy Polyakov
>>> There are some fairly severe performance hits in engine support unless the >>> engine includes all the submodes as well. >>> That includes things you are just starting to play with now, like the >>> combined >>> AES+SHA1 on x86. >> ??? Here is output for 'speed -engine intel-accel -evp >> ae

Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-11-07 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:51:39PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: > Peter Waltenberg wrote: > > There are some fairly severe performance hits in engine support unless the > > engine includes all the submodes as well. > > That includes things you are just starting to play with now, like the > > combi

Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-11-07 Thread Andy Polyakov
Peter Waltenberg wrote: > There are some fairly severe performance hits in engine support unless the > engine includes all the submodes as well. > That includes things you are just starting to play with now, like the > combined > AES+SHA1 on x86. ??? Here is output for 'speed -engine intel-acce

Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-11-05 Thread Peter Waltenberg
T" Sent by: owner-openssl-...@openssl.orgDate: 11/05/2011 09:44PMCc: openssl-dev@openssl.orgSubject: Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL> As some of you may be aware the new Oracle SPARC T4 processor has > hardware crypto support just like its predecessors SPARC T1,T2,T3.>&g

Re: [openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-11-05 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
> As some of you may be aware the new Oracle SPARC T4 processor has > hardware crypto support just like its predecessors SPARC T1,T2,T3. > > However unlike the prior SPARC T series processors the hardware crypto > is not hyper-privileged but is instead new instructions accessible from > unprivil

[openssl.org #2627] SPARC T4 support for OpenSSL

2011-10-19 Thread Darren J Moffat via RT
As some of you may be aware the new Oracle SPARC T4 processor has hardware crypto support just like its predecessors SPARC T1,T2,T3. However unlike the prior SPARC T series processors the hardware crypto is not hyper-privileged but is instead new instructions accessible from unprivileged userla