[openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2003-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
OK, I looked at the no-engine patch again, and really saw no harm in it, so it's committed, and will be part of all release from 0.9.7a and on (as well as the current 0.9.7 and main snapshots). This ticket is now resolved. -- Richard Levitte

Re: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine(openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2003-01-30 Thread Geoff Thorpe
* Richard Levitte via RT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: OK, I looked at the no-engine patch again, and really saw no harm in it, so it's committed, and will be part of all release from 0.9.7a and on (as well as the current 0.9.7 and main snapshots). This ticket is now resolved. Erm, I think

Re: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine(openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2003-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:33:59 -0500, Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: geoff Erm, I think there's a fundemantal problem with this. I understand the geoff desire to build a version of openssl such that it doesn't include the geoff engine footprint, nor its execution

[openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
I have to ask: why do you feel the need to remove the ENGINE framework? I can understand that you might not want to have any built-in engines (the option 'no-hw' to Configure should help. If not, I'm happy to apply a corrective patch). I'd like a good explanation before I consider applying

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread Steven Reddie
port. Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte via RT Sent: Friday, 4 October 2002 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915) I have

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread
port. Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte via RT Sent: Friday, 4 October 2002 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915) I have

[openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Oct 4 15:32:21 2002]: I found that the no-hw option didn't work. Hmm, I probably need to reread that thread. Could you tell me approximately when it was discussed? After discussing it on the list I agreed to contribute a no-engine option. I understand that

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread Steven Reddie
be. :-) Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte via RT Sent: Saturday, 5 October 2002 12:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915) [[EMAIL

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread
be. :-) Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte via RT Sent: Saturday, 5 October 2002 12:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915) [[EMAIL

[openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-09-17 Thread
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-09-17 Thread Steven Reddie
, September 17, 2002 5:02 PM Subject: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915) __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List