Re: [openssl.org #355] Bug: RSA_PKCS1_PADDING use in rsa/rsa_sign.c

2002-11-26 Thread Nils Larsch via RT
Eric Cronin via RT wrote: At one point in time, RSA_PKCS1_PADDING was evidently #defined as '11', the size in bytes of the extra room needed for PKCS1 padding in an RSA block. In the current CVS version of OpenSSL it is #defined to 1 and is just used as a selector in switch statements.

[openssl.org #355] Bug: RSA_PKCS1_PADDING use in rsa/rsa_sign.c

2002-11-26 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Your analysis is correct. Thanks. I've just committed a change. This ticket is now resolved. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Nov 22 10:27:03 2002]: At one point in time, RSA_PKCS1_PADDING was evidently #defined as '11', the size in bytes of the extra room needed for PKCS1 padding in an RSA

[openssl.org #355] Bug: RSA_PKCS1_PADDING use in rsa/rsa_sign.c

2002-11-22 Thread Eric Cronin via RT
At one point in time, RSA_PKCS1_PADDING was evidently #defined as '11', the size in bytes of the extra room needed for PKCS1 padding in an RSA block. In the current CVS version of OpenSSL it is #defined to 1 and is just used as a selector in switch statements. Except in rsa_sign.c: