Old, unsupported release. Old, unsupported operating system. :)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manage
i forgot to add-
dbx's message says:
SIGSEGV (absentee space fault) in getrn at line 430 in file "lhash.c"
couldn't read "lhash.c"
Wendy Palm wrote:
how's this?
* 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash =
0x00801a40), line 430 in "lhash.c"
1 lh_insert(lh
how's this?
* 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash = 0x00801a40), line 430 in "lhash.c"
1 lh_insert(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930), line 189 in "lhash.c"
2 OBJ_add_object(obj = 0x000404088a00), line 253 in "obj_dat.c"
3 OBJ_cr
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:59:01 2003]:
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
++
..++
writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
-
You
i forgot to add-
dbx's message says:
SIGSEGV (absentee space fault) in getrn at line 430 in file "lhash.c"
couldn't read "lhash.c"
Wendy Palm wrote:
> how's this?
>
> * 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash =
> 0x00801a40), line 430 in "lhash.c"
>1 lh
how's this?
* 0 getrn(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930, rhash =
0x00801a40), line 430 in "lhash.c"
1 lh_insert(lh = 0x000404092290, data = 0x00040409d930), line 189 in
"lhash.c"
2 OBJ_add_object(obj = 0x000404088a00), line 253 in "obj_dat.c"
3
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:59:01 2003]:
>
>
>>$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
>>Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
>>++
>>..++
>>writing new private key to 'privkey.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:59:01 2003]:
> $ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
> Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
> ++
> ..++
> writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
> -
> You are about to be aske
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem -rand /tmp/somefile
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
++
..++
writing new private key to 'privkey.pem'
-
You are about to be asked to enter information that will be incorporated
into your cert
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 1 00:02:48 2003]:
> $ cd apps
> $ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem
>
> unable to load 'random state'
> This means that the random number generator has not been seeded
> with much random data.
> Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
> 8953:error:240640
$ cd apps
$ ./openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -out sscert.pem
unable to load 'random state'
This means that the random number generator has not been seeded
with much random data.
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
8953:error:24064064:random number generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not
seeded:md_
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 21:36:01 2003]:
> i'm happy to test anything you want, but crays are more my forte
> and NEC just my spare time, so i can't provide much programming
> help myself.
>
I don't have acess to anything like that myself so...
>From that report it looks like the stuff
i'm happy to test anything you want, but crays are more my forte
and NEC just my spare time, so i can't provide much programming
help myself.
Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 21:06:07 2003]:
>
>
>>i'm sorry for the delay in response. i've been out of the office
>
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 21:06:07 2003]:
> i'm sorry for the delay in response. i've been out of the office
>during the
> last couple of weeks.
>
> yes, more tests fail than i reported, but we only wanted enough
>openssl
> to work with openssh, so once i got what i wanted, i didn
i'm sorry for the delay in response. i've been out of the office during the
last couple of weeks.
yes, more tests fail than i reported, but we only wanted enough openssl
to work with openssh, so once i got what i wanted, i didn't go any further
until i had more time to devote to it.
attached is
Will anything happen with this?
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 18 11:02:31 2003]:
> I already answered this once, but it didn't come through for some
> reason...
>
> > >>+ "sx6", "cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::",
> > >>
> > >
> > > No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
> >
>
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
+ "sx6", "cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::",
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
-g overrides any optimization you give, and i think there's a problem with
the optimizer anyway because with default optimization, aes-128-cbc test fails.
it's
I already answered this once, but it didn't come through for some
reason...
> >>+ "sx6", "cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::",
> >>
> >
> > No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
>
> -g overrides any optimization you give,
Yes, that's what normally happens...
> and i think th
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
>>+ "sx6", "cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::",
>>
>
> No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
-g overrides any optimization you give, and i think there's a problem with
the optimizer anyway because with default optimization, aes-128-cbc test fails.
> + "sx6", "cc:-g -DTERMIOS::(unknown):::SIXTY_FOUR_BIT DES_INT:::",
No optimization? Not even lousy -O?
SIXTY_FOUR_BIT? SIXTY_FOUR_BIT aims ILP32 ABIs implemented on 64-bit
CPUs, N32 ABI on IRIX 6 is one example. If your sizeof(long)==8, then
you should use SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG. Please confirm.
Cray Inc provides support for some NEC sites, so that's why this is coming from me.
configuration patches to make openssl compile on NEC's SX-6 machines.
diff -c openssl-0.9.7.orig/config.orig openssl-0.9.7.sx6/config
*** openssl-0.9.7.orig/config.orig Fri Jan 10 17:54:08 2003
--- openssl-0.9.7
21 matches
Mail list logo
