[geoff - Thu Apr 1 18:13:51 2004]:
Can you please resubmit the patch as an attachment rather than
inlining
it? The patch gets word-wrapped otherwise and is unusable.
Jelte,
Any news on this? If you could update the request tracker ticket with a
clean (non-wrapped) copy of your patch, I'd
Can you please resubmit the patch as an attachment rather than
inlining
it? The patch gets word-wrapped otherwise and is unusable.
Any news on this? If you could update the request tracker ticket with a
clean (non-wrapped) copy of your patch, I'd be able to take this further.
Oh, i
Looks mostly ok. It's missing a RSA_METHOD change and has a redundant
BN_new() (memory leak), but nothing major. I'll tidy it up and commit it
in a sec, thanks.
--
Geoff Thorpe, RT/openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project
Hi,
i have written a patch that replaces the exponent argument in
RSA_generate_key_ex with a BIGNUM. See also my mail from a few days ago.
It is against the snapshot of 20040331 (the CVS repository was full every
time i tried). I have not made another wrapper function that still uses
the long
Can you please resubmit the patch as an attachment rather than inlining
it? The patch gets word-wrapped otherwise and is unusable.
--
Geoff Thorpe, RT/openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project
Can you please resubmit the patch as an attachment rather than inlining
it? The patch gets word-wrapped otherwise and is unusable.
I did, but apparently it got mangled on the way somewhere (i just checked
my sent-mail and it shows as an attachment there at least). So let me try
this again,
