Re: First (initializing) call to RAND_status() very slow on Win32

2005-03-14 Thread Lee Dilkie
Ferdinand Prantl wrote: [...] What is interesting, 471 heap entries takes much more time than 506 thread entries. OK, I can understand the slowness, if many big heaps are present; this code is run the worst count_of_heaps * 80 times: RAND_add(hentry, hentry.dwSize, 5); [...] I myself have

First (initializing) call to RAND_status() very slow on Win32

2005-03-11 Thread Ferdinand Prantl
Title: First (initializing) call to RAND_status() very slow on Win32 Hello, I am sorry for the long post, there is a question at the very end :-) (I sent it to the the openssl-users group at first, maybe you the developers are interested rather than users.) We integrate OpenSSL 0.9.6l

Re: First (initializing) call to RAND_status() very slow on Win32

2005-03-11 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
Ferdinand Prantl wrote: Hello, I am sorry for the long post, there is a question at the very end :-) (I sent it to the the openssl-users group at first, maybe you the developers are interested rather than users.) We integrate OpenSSL 0.9.6l compiled with standard settings and linked statically on

RE: First (initializing) call to RAND_status() very slow on Win32

2005-03-11 Thread Ferdinand Prantl
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernhard Froehlich Ferdinand Prantl wrote: Hello, I am sorry for the long post, there is a question at the very end :-) (I sent it to the the openssl-users group at first, maybe you the developers are interested