the certified code begins and ends.
Peter
Steven Reddie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/14/04 03:49 PM
Please respond to
openssl-dev
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
RE: OpenSSL thread safety
(was: possibly bug in crypto/rand/rand_win.c)
Hi Peter,
Those
Hi Jeffrey,
Come to think of it, maybe OpenSSL should simply perform a call to
RAND_poll() as part of the DLL initialization. This would solve many
problems.
No, it would create some. RAND_poll() calls LoadLibrary() which is a no-no
from DllMain(). malloc() is not safe to call from
to support
legacy systems where the shared lib initialization code just doesn't get
called.
Peter
Steven Reddie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/14/04 03:08 PM
Please respond to
openssl-dev
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
OpenSSL thread safety (was:
possibly bug
?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter WaltenbergSent: Wednesday, 14 July 2004 3:26
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: OpenSSL thread
safety (was: possibly bug in
crypto/rand/rand_win.c)1. It is
safe to create/initialise
