So this seems to be:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg10471.html
Kurt
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@opens
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:30:51AM -0400, Dave Thompson wrote:
> >
> > With google I get:
> > Protocol : TLSv1.2
> > Cipher: DES-CBC3-SHA
> >
> > (Or by default)
> > Protocol : TLSv1.2
> > Cipher: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
> >
> > Both of course work as expected.
> >
> From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2013 18:50
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:25:06PM -0400, Dave Thompson wrote:
> > > My conclussions:
> > > - One of the 2 sides doesn't implement
> > > DES-CBC-SHA/DES-CBC3-SHA properly
> >
> > ... I think you
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:25:06PM -0400, Dave Thompson wrote:
> > My conclussions:
> > - One of the 2 sides doesn't implement
> > DES-CBC-SHA/DES-CBC3-SHA properly
>
> ... I think you're right and I suspect the other side because
> openssl interoperates with lots of folks -- unless there's
> s
> From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx via RT
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2013 12:30
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:30:58AM -0400, Dave Thompson wrote:
> >
> > Looking at your state_debug.log (which tries 1.2) I see:
> > read/write preliminary SMTP as normal
> > write ClientHe
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:30:58AM -0400, Dave Thompson wrote:
>
> Looking at your state_debug.log (which tries 1.2) I see:
> read/write preliminary SMTP as normal
> write ClientHello: offer 1.2
> read ServerHello: agree 1.0 DES-CBC3-SHA
> rest of handshake normal
>
> Aside: I notice your build (
> From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx via RT
> Sent: Saturday, 15 June, 2013 11:08
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:09:56PM -0400, Dave Thompson wrote:
> > > From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx
> > > Sent: Thursday, 13 June, 2013 03:13
> >
> > > > Whe
> From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx
> Sent: Thursday, 13 June, 2013 03:13
> > When talking to an exchange server I get some weird behaviour when
> > using the 1.0.1e version. I get a TLS 1.0 connection, but the
> > problems go away when using -no_tls1_2
> >
If you got
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:32:28AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When talking to an exchange server I get some weird behaviour when
> using the 1.0.1e version. I get a TLS 1.0 connection, but the
> problems go away when using -no_tls1_2
>
> An example connection is with:
> openssl s
