On Thu, Jun 30, 2005, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Its certainly possible. There is an added complication in that some thought
has
to be given to future directions of development.
For example the current RSA API lacks any easy way to pass additional
parameters to some padding types. OAEP
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
dank If so, perhaps that might provide a way forward: apps that need
dank a stable interface can use the gnutls api (which openssl could
dank provide as a wrapper); everyone else could use the openssl api
dank (which gnutls seems to provide as a wrapper,
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Dan Nuffer wrote:
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
This means that changing this in the short term is likely to cause
widespread
application breakage which wouldn't be too popular :-(
Speaking as an application developer, I would willingly go
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Geoff Thorpe
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:15 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc: Banginwar, Rajesh
Subject: Re: Considering SSL and Cryto libraries for LSB
On June 29, 2005 08:44 pm, Banginwar
understanding.
Thanks,
-Rajesh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Nuffer
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:33 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Considering SSL and Cryto libraries for LSB
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 1:01 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Considering SSL and Cryto libraries for LSB
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
We recently started looking at some of Desktop specific libraries
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
As part of LSB standardization process, we look at the interfaces and
corresponding data types and make it part of the specification. If the
data types are expected to change and the interfaces do not hide them,
then that part of the library may
Dr. Stephen Henson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30/06/2005 08:14 AM
Please respond to
openssl-dev
To
openssl-dev@openssl.org
cc
Subject
Re: Considering SSL and Cryto
libraries for LSB
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
As part of LSB
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
This means that changing this in the short term is likely to cause widespread
application breakage which wouldn't be too popular :-(
Speaking as an application developer, I would willingly go through a
one-time source code upgrade to achieve binary compatiblity.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
IBM has already done this in creating it's FIPS certified crypto. code
which is layered on top of OpenSSL.
In our case we can guarantee that IBM code only uses our restricted subset
of the OpenSSL API.
Unfortunately you'll need to support the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Dan Nuffer wrote:
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
This means that changing this in the short term is likely to cause
widespread
application breakage which wouldn't be too popular :-(
Speaking as an application developer, I would willingly go through a
one-time source
On June 29, 2005 05:50 pm, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
As part of LSB standardization process, we look at the interfaces and
corresponding data types and make it part of the specification. If the
data types are expected to change and the interfaces do not hide them,
then that part of the library
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Geoff Thorpe
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 5:45 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc: Banginwar, Rajesh
Subject: Re: Considering SSL and Cryto libraries for LSB
On June 29, 2005 05:50 pm, Banginwar
On June 29, 2005 08:44 pm, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
So far from the preliminary analysis that we have done (by looking at
some of the OSS applications) we see both libssl and libcrypto being
used. E.g. from libcrypto I find functions in EVP, RSA, MD5 and DSA
sets more commonly used than
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:44:38 -0700, Banginwar,
Rajesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rajesh.banginwar Do you or anyone on this project have data
rajesh.banginwar suggesting which APIs are candidates for LSB
rajesh.banginwar inclusion both from demand and stability point of
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Quite honestly, even though I'm quite an enthusiastic OpenSSL
developer for years and have been for years (since it started,
really), I can't really recommend OpenSSL as an LSB candidate from
that point of view, as it stands today. Every major upgrade (which
What is the benefit of adding parts of OpenSSL to the LSB now?
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:05:07 -0700, Dan Kegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dank http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/
dank exposes two APIs: the OpenSSL api (I gather?), and its own.
About the OpenSSL API, this page answers part of the question.
18 matches
Mail list logo
