Bodo Moeller wrote:
Makes sense. I'll put this into the CVS (applicable to the 0.9.9-dev
branch only, if anyone is wondering -- i.e., this mismatch isn't in
any of the releases).
The change is in the CVS, but it's still not in the snapshot at:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:06:47PM +0200, Gisle Vanem wrote:
crypto/rsa/rsa_locl.h wrongly uses 'size_t' in some arguments. It should
match the implementation in crypto/rsa/rsa_sign.c (what happened to this
file?). A patch:
--- orig/crypto/rsa/rsa_locl.h 2006-08-28 19:01:02 +0200
crypto/rsa/rsa_locl.h wrongly uses 'size_t' in some arguments. It should
match the implementation in crypto/rsa/rsa_sign.c (what happened to this
file?). A patch:
--- orig/crypto/rsa/rsa_locl.h 2006-08-28 19:01:02 +0200
+++ crypto/rsa/rsa_locl.h 2006-08-29 15:30:50 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4
