time_t remarks

2005-12-29 Thread Peter Sylvester
I saw in the lastest snapshots that in the ssl library the fundction time has been casted to an unsigned long. This seems to be some hack to cover the 2038 problem on 32 bit machines. I am not sure whether the attempted solution is good: As far as I see the only usage is to determine whether

Re: time_t remarks

2005-12-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:44:18PM +0100, Peter Sylvester wrote: I saw in the lastest snapshots that in the ssl library the fundction time has been casted to an unsigned long. This seems to be some hack to cover the 2038 problem on 32 bit machines. I am not sure whether the attempted