s2_lib.c:ssl2_get_cipher_by_char
s3_lib.c:ssl3_get_cipher_by_char
has this code:
if (init)
{
CRYPTO_w_lock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
...[qsort and stuff]...
CRYPTO_w_unlock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
init=0;
}
There needs to be a if (init) after the lock is acquired
I wrote that the next snapshots should solve the problem. Functions
SSLv23_client_method(), SSLv23_server_method(),
SSLv2_client_method(),SSLv2_server_method(),
SSLv3_client_method(),SSLv3_server_method(),
TLSv1_client_method(),
Greetings:
Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to safe primes in DH and
point compression in elliptic-curve cryptography.
I ask that the following patches be implemented to inform people of
these facts.
Sincerely,
john
--
john o goyo
Yes, the
if (test)
lock()
if (test)
construct is very important (although I thought I saw a bug about
JVM implementations getting this wrong).
Anyone doing threads programming should read Andrew Birrell's 1989 tutorial.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:47:14PM -0700, Patrick McCormick wrote:
Many thanks for putting in a lock. However, the race condition has not been
eliminated.
[...]init must be checked after the lock is entered in order to
prevent the client_data setup from happening twice. So,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:47:14PM -0700, Patrick McCormick wrote:
Many thanks for putting in a lock. However, the race condition has not been
eliminated.
[...]init must be checked after the lock is entered in order to
prevent the client_data setup from happening twice. So,
I get reports again that the crypt() macro gets in the way for some
applications. I'm strongly thinking of disabling it entirely. Anyone
against?
If I don't hear any complaints about the thought before the weekend,
I'll carry on with it, in 0.9.7 and 0.9.7-dev.
--
Richard Levitte \
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0.9.7 caused massive havoc compiling kerberos 4 (and to some extent 5) when
I integrated beta 3 into the freebsd tree. The crypt() macro was a minor
annoyance. The bigger problem was the redefinition of the DES key state
block (from array to struct). openbsd apparently has workarounds that
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
As usual, I really wrote that the bug will be fixed in the next
snapshot (but RT2 still does not believe me :-).
--
Bodo Möller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 08:49:47AM -0400, John O Goyo wrote:
Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to safe primes in DH [...]
+ Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to the use of safe primes
+ in the DH key-exchange, including US patent 5,933,504 and pending US
+
John O Goyo wrote:
Greetings:
Certicom has intellectual property rights relating to safe primes in DH and
point compression in elliptic-curve cryptography.
Really? Has that been tested?
I ask that the following patches be implemented to inform people of
these facts.
Why would we want to
You are absolutely right, of course. I got similar constructs right
in the past, but I guess this time I was too busy with various other
things to really think about what I was writing ...
The next snapshot should really fix the problem.
I looked at the changes in CVS and everything seems
In 0.9.7-stable ssltest.c, lines 408 416 need terminating brackets.
Chris Brook
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Chris Brook wrote:
In 0.9.7-stable ssltest.c, lines 408 416 need terminating brackets.
Chris Brook
Thanks, fixed,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus,
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Sep 24 10:23:50 2002]:
Hi,
I am trying to install openssl on AIX using gcc
GCC version - 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
AIX version - 4.3.2.0
OpenSSL version - 0.9.7-dev
The output of config -t is attached.
The make is not sucessful. The following is the error
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:43:21PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:26:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
Somehow the RT2 system doesn't like the comments I enter at the
website when resolving a ticket ...
I am not yet sure (would need to do a test), but it
You are absolutely right, of course. I got similar constructs right
in the past, but I guess this time I was too busy with various other
things to really think about what I was writing ...
The next snapshot should really fix the problem.
I looked at the changes in CVS and everything seems
18 matches
Mail list logo
