Andy Polyakov wrote:
> How do we know that these are not or should not be treated as mingw64
> bugs? I mean it worked for mingw for years (I wonder how by the way),
> now ancestor is *being developed* and how come it's not its fault:-)
I don't really understand that part about "ancestor", but nev
>> How do we know that these are not or should not be treated as mingw64
>> bugs? I mean it worked for mingw for years (I wonder how by the way),
>> now ancestor is *being developed* and how come it's not its fault:-)
>
> I don't really understand that part about "ancestor", but never mind ...
Oo
