Hi Douglas,
Is this right way to get the peer certificate in a data buffer ?
STACK_OF(X509) *sk;
int ii = 0, noOfCerts = 0 , res = -1;
X509 *certs[15];
unsigned char *intFmtOfCerts[15];
unsigned int len[15];
sk= SSL_get_peer_cert_chain(connssl-handle);
noOfCerts =
Do you have plans to support security engine in AMCC PPC440EPx
processor? AMCC has released Universal Driver Module for this engine
under GPL.
Regards,
George Romaniuk
Ablyx LLC
__
OpenSSL Project
crypto/bio/bss_sock.c contains the following code:
static long sock_ctrl(BIO *b, int cmd, long num, void *ptr)
{
long ret=1;
int *ip;
switch (cmd)
{
case BIO_CTRL_RESET:
num=0; /* BUG */
case
Hello,
Attached is a new version, against latest snapshot.
I don't know how the -DOPENSSL_USE_APPLINK works for you guys... It produces
invalid asm for me...
I don't fully understand what this file do...
perl ../ms/uplink.pl coff uplink-cof.s
x86_64-pc-mingw32-gcc -I. -I.. -I../include
The alarm() will be removed:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2182468group_id=202880atid=983354
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Maybe. The last time I tried this was in 2001 with the
Globus Toolkit 4.0.16
$Source:
/home/globdev/CVS/globus-1998_04_16/Globus/Security/gssapi_ssleay/sslutils.c,v $
$Date: 2001/05/05 22:41:27 $
$Revision: 1.113 $
$Author: dengert $
has proxy_marshal_*() routines to
Dear OpenSSL developers,
I would like to propose the following patch to engines/e_chil.c:
Index: engines/e_chil.c
===
RCS file: /home/openssl/cvs/openssl/engines/e_chil.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 e_chil.c
---
Dear OpenSSL developers,
The following patch fixes the warning emitted by ./config on the Apple
platform to include the correct invocation for a 64bits build. It
also ignores the built libraries, which on this platform have a
'.dylib' suffix:
Index: .cvsignore
The GPL is explicitly not compatible with OpenSSL's license. This
makes it rather difficult to use GPL code in the project.
-Kyle H
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:55 AM, George Romaniuk via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you have plans to support security engine in AMCC PPC440EPx
processor? AMCC
