Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-26 Thread Richard Levitte
In message on Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:54:35 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev said: openssl-dev> There was some discussion about 1.0.1 being EoL on a FreeBSD list [0], openssl-dev> and whether it would make sense to

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: > 31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos": > > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev > > wrote: > >>  [moving from github to -dev] > >> > >>  On 01/27/2017 07:36 AM, mattcaswell wrote: > >>  >

Re: [openssl-dev] Travis [extended tests] tag

2017-02-26 Thread Salz, Rich
> > tests was arranged by adding "[extended tests]" tag to *last* commit. ... > > And in the context it's worth keeping in mind that it's possible to > > skip CI tests altogether by tagging commit with "[skip ci]". This ... >> > Can you explain how to tag it? Your commit message should have the

Re: [openssl-dev] Travis [extended tests] tag

2017-02-26 Thread Andy Polyakov
>> In order to improve CI turn-around times Travis config in master branch >> was tweaked to minimize the time it takes to process pull requests. This >> is done by "short-circuiting" most expensive tests: sanitizers, >> coverage, wine-based tests. Thing to keep in mind is that >>

[openssl-dev] Travis [extended tests] tag

2017-02-26 Thread Andy Polyakov
In order to improve CI turn-around times Travis config in master branch was tweaked to minimize the time it takes to process pull requests. This is done by "short-circuiting" most expensive tests: sanitizers, coverage, wine-based tests. Thing to keep in mind is that "short-circuited" test come out

Re: [openssl-dev] Travis [extended tests] tag

2017-02-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:23:42PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: > In order to improve CI turn-around times Travis config in master branch > was tweaked to minimize the time it takes to process pull requests. This > is done by "short-circuiting" most expensive tests: sanitizers, > coverage,

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl/openssl] ABI compatibility 1.0.0-->1.0.1-->1.0.2

2017-02-26 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
26.02.2017, 16:27, "Kurt Roeckx":> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:26:06AM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:>>  31.01.2017, 10:21, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos":>>  > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:54 -0600, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev>>  > wrote:>>  >>  [moving from github to -dev]>>    >>  On 01/27/2017