Re: Visual Studio 2005 and openssl question

2007-06-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
You probably need the manifest at the application directory. The dll cannot find its runtime. On 6/2/07, gary clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, I know this is probably inappropriate venue but I am at a loss on why I cannot run openssl on a XP windows machine which does not have openssl

Re: Visual Studio 2005 and openssl question

2007-06-02 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Don't use Microsoft compiler :) I've submitted a patch for cross compile openssl (mingw) it produces much less dependencies. But it was not accepted yet into any snapshot. http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1451user=guestpass=guest Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. On 6/2/07, gary clark

Re: [openssl.org #1552] mingw patch for openssl-0.9.8e

2007-06-26 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
will find the current trunk snapshot to be a better reference. Just wanted to stop using MS compiler... :) Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. On 6/26/07, Roumen Petrov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose following patch to openssl-0.9.8e source (see attachment openssl-0.9.8e

Re: [openssl.org #1553] mscrypto engine for 0.9.8

2007-06-29 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
. There is also an issue of resources prompt (passphrase, token) and a small issue of object serialization in engine interface. Am am afraid that as long as OpenSSL engine interface will remain so low-level developers will look into alternate solution. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. On 6/29/07, Roumen Petrov

Re: [openssl.org #1553] mscrypto engine for 0.9.8

2007-07-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
of engine API as well... So application may construct proper dialogs. Be aware that if you use Protected storage or Smartcard based you will get Windows UI GUI activated automatically. So, for example, you will not be able to use this solution for server application. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev

Re: Makefile for building openssl for windows using mingw32 on linux

2007-08-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello Maximilian, There are a lot of issues with mingw32 out there... Examples: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1451 http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1511 http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1552 But none are added into the snapshot... Alon. On 8/1/07,

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-10-27 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 10/27/07, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason why not merge the patch into snapshots? The only reason is lack of time. Trouble is that there also are other minor open issues in mingw build and idea is to sit down some day and reflect over the whole build procedure. A.

Re: PKCS#11 wrapper around OpenSSL

2007-11-19 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Nov 19, 2007 10:52 PM, Steven Bade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe that Sun contributed a pretty robust PKCS#11 engine for openSSL. It support a single static (compile time) provider, and even does not login to the token... I don't understand why it is packed as a patch and not as separate

Issues with latest snapshot

2008-03-15 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, Tried to compile latest snapshot (openssl-SNAP-20080314.tar.gz) In apps/apps.h the apps_shutdown macro always calls to COMP_zlib_cleanup() even if zlib is not enabled. Removing this makes it work. I use mingw so maybe it was not tested yet... There are missing symbols of CMS when linking

Plee for merge Mingw support (rt#1552)

2008-04-12 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
we know that all is included into next version of OpenSSL, and stop chasing trunk? Thank you, Alon Bar-Lev. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

Re: [openssl.org #1552] mingw patch for openssl-0.9.8e

2008-04-17 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Thank you!!! Will check. On 4/17/08, Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have applied both the patch from Roumen Petrov and the Fixup from Alon Bar-Lev. I don't have a mingw environment to actually verify the correct operation. Please check out the next snapshot and verify

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-10-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 10/22/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 5. Added -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN and drop the conflict undef of x509.h While I don't mind having to compile the library itself with special flags, the above implies that every _user_ of OpenSSL who includes x509.h has

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-10-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 10/22/08, Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alon Bar-Lev via RT wrote: [SNIP] For some strange reason perl reports that symlinks are available under msys, while it cannot create symbolic link when the to is not reachable from cwd. May be I can access a msys environment next

Re: [openssl.org #1771] CVS Head crypto/jpake/Makefile - missing install rule?

2008-10-31 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Also string.h is missing. On 10/31/08, Alon Bar-Lev via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: making install in crypto/jpake... make[2]: Entering directory `/home/alonbl/tmp/Development/opensc/build/trunk/tmp/openssl-SNAP-20081028/crypto/jpake

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-11-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 11/1/08, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please test the other suggested bn_lcl.h modification? While you're on it... I cannot actually test it... I can compile and users may test. I don't have a win64 machine. How is it tested? Implicitly by an

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-11-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Great! Can you commit the mingw64 other stuff? On 11/1/08, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I managed to produce them myself with mingw-w64-bin_x86-64-linux_20080921.tar.bz2. Modified sha512.c is fine, Great! My environment is gcc-4.3.2, binutils-CVS-head,

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-11-03 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 11/3/08, Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why mingw64 ... -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x333 ? This has to defined by openssl headers (if not defined) to 0x400. HEAD version is for winsock2 and I'm not sure that winsock2 is available as example for ancient nt3.51. The winsock2 library is

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-11-05 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Roumen? mingw64 is merged now... Please confirm this so we have mingw working again. This is also affect the mingw64. Thank you, Alon. On 10/23/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/22/08, Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alon Bar-Lev via RT wrote: [SNIP] For some

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-11-13 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, appro added assembly support for mingw64 at [1]. I've succeeded in compiling this with the following patch. Thank you! Alon. [1] http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17619 --- --- openssl-SNAP-20081113/Configure 2008-11-12 22:00:07.0 +0200 +++

[CVS] J-PAKE is not experimental in HEAD - broke mingw

2008-11-15 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, I believe: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17631 Broke mingw mkdef.pl although I don't fully understand why. It tries to export the jpake functions even if the jpake is disabled by default. To temporary solve it I use the following: --- openssl-SNAP-20081115.org/util/mkdef.pl

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-11-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Any luck? On 11/6/08, Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Roumen? mingw64 is merged now... Please confirm this so we have mingw working again. This is also affect the mingw64. [SNIP] Cross-compilation is fine only with additional changes in rand_egd.c

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-11-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
So in the mean time can the patches merged? On 11/23/08, Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Any luck? On 11/6/08, Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Roumen? mingw64 is merged now... Please confirm this so we have mingw

Re: failure building native win32 with mingw

2008-12-03 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 12/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're apparently using a relatively recent version of headers (particularly wincrypt.h, IIRC), so you get bitten by one of the conflicts mentioned in e.g. http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1693 HTH,

Re: failure building native win32 with mingw

2008-12-03 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
BTW: 1693 can be closed. On 12/3/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're apparently using a relatively recent version of headers (particularly wincrypt.h, IIRC), so you get bitten by one of the conflicts mentioned

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-12-12 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello OpenSSL developers, Please merge these patches [2], [3] from bug [1]. Current cross compile is broken as the cpp used is not cross compile one. It causes mingw cross compile build to fail. I will be happy to know if there is something wrong, so I be able to provider better solution.

[PATCH] Fixup compilation for gcc-aix target

2009-11-26 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Version 1.0.0-beta4 and latest 1.0.0.0 snapshot. Tested to work in Linux-2.4, Linux-2.6, Solaris-8, Solaris-10, AIX-3.5 sltest.c:157:1: error: _XOPEN_SOURCE redefined In file included from /opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.0/include/assert.h:64, from ssltest.c:146:

Re: [openssl.org #2137] [PATCH] mingw fixups

2010-01-13 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Bar-Lev via RT wrote: The following is required in order to make beta4 compile using mingw (w64). Every time there is #includewindows.h  some symbols should be removed. Also, there is no need to #includewindows.h  if e_os2.h was included. [SNIP] diff -urNp openssl-1.0.0-beta4.org/e_os.h

Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32

2006-10-17 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32

2006-10-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
. But it is not enough... Since there is a matter of ddlwrap stuff, and me be more... I may alter the build process if no one has done it yet and submit a patch. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32

2006-10-19 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
? cygwin? You just add $(LIBNAME).def to SHAREDFLAGS? 3. Forget about dllwrap and such. Modern Mingw32 produce absolutely correct dlls with just gcc -shared -o dllname, if you specify .def file along with object file. Thanks! Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev

Re: PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2006-12-28 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
declaration a.c:1: error: previous declaration of ‘aaa’ was here So I removed the static from the macro. I had to do some more modifications. Please review. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. --- diff -urNp openssl-SNAP-20061228.org/engines/ccgost/Makefile openssl-SNAP-20061228/engines/ccgost/Makefile

[openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-01-19 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, I did not see this patch was added to snapshot... Is there anything more I can do? Is something missing? Is something wrong? I will be glad to know about that. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-03-16 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Hello, I don't exactly undersand the maintenance model of OpenSSL. I would really like to see a milestone set for this issue (http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1451). We are waiting for this so that user will not be forced to patch OpenSSL in order to cross compile it. I will be

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-05-19 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
[ping] Passed a long time since I sent this patch. MinGW cross compile does not work without it. Is there something wrong with this patch? http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1451 Thanks! Alon Bar-Lev. __ OpenSSL

Re: [openssl.org #1334] Resolved: [PATCH] Cross-compile for Windows from Linux

2007-07-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #1334] Resolved: [PATCH] Cross-compile for Windows from Linux

2007-07-11 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
You've suggested approach that mimics .bat-based build, i.e. generating big flat make-file, while we've chosen to discontinue it in favor of Unix-like build procedure, i.e. having make traverse source tree for Makefiles [see development branch]. In other words suggested approach is not the

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-09-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Hello, An update. 1. The issue with OPENSSL_IMPLEMENT_GLOBAL is gone now. 2. Merged with Roumen Petrov's patch: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1552 Except of not postfix engine dlls with eay32. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. --- diff -urNp openssl-SNAP-20070901/Configure openssl

Re: [openssl.org #1552] mingw patch for openssl-cvs

2007-09-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
On Friday 03 August 2007, Roumen Petrov via RT wrote: And now against CVS Merged patch available at: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1552 Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-09-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
On Saturday 01 September 2007, Alon Bar-Lev via RT wrote: Hello, An update. 1. The issue with OPENSSL_IMPLEMENT_GLOBAL is gone now. 2. Merged with Roumen Petrov's patch: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1552 Except of not postfix engine dlls with eay32. Best Regards

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-10-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Hello OpenSSL developers, Any reason why not merge the patch into snapshots? http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1451 It is important for people who wish to compile to Microsoft platform without using any Microsoft resources. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2007-10-27 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
On 10/27/07, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason why not merge the patch into snapshots? The only reason is lack of time. Trouble is that there also are other minor open issues in mingw build and idea is to sit down some day and reflect over the whole build procedure. A.

Re: [openssl.org #1552] mingw patch for openssl-cvs

2008-02-17 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Great! Works also with cross compile, closes #1415! A minor fix is attached. The prefix must be enclosed with brackets as when $$x$(y), the y is translated first. Just for my reminder: ./Configure --prefix=// --cross-compile-prefix=mingw32- shared mingw make install INSTALL_PREFIX=/tmp/w32 Alon.

Re: [openssl.org #1451] PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2008-02-17 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Can be closed in favor of: http://rt.openssl.org/index.html?q=1552 __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List

[openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-10-06 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
minor issue with msys... For some strange reason perl reports that symlinks are available under msys, while it cannot create symbolic link when the to is not reachable from cwd. Attached is also a fix for this one. Thanks, Alon Bar-Lev. --- diff -urNp openssl-SNAP-20081003.org/ssl/kssl.c openssl

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-10-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Hello, Attached is a new version, against latest snapshot. I don't know how the -DOPENSSL_USE_APPLINK works for you guys... It produces invalid asm for me... I don't fully understand what this file do... perl ../ms/uplink.pl coff uplink-cof.s x86_64-pc-mingw32-gcc -I. -I.. -I../include

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-10-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
The alarm() will be removed: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2182468group_id=202880atid=983354 __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-10-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Attached are patches, please address this issues, it is hard to keep sync this way. The order of the issue is according to importance, (1, 2, 3) blockers. Thanks! 1. _XOPEN_SOURCE cannot be used in mingw, strptime is never used anyway? 2. Make domd use cross compiler if available. 3. Update

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-10-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
this already at e_os.h. It cleaner as it does not include extra headers and removes the conflicts from x509.h... But it is optional. Waiting for 2, 3, 4... :) Thanks, Alon. On 10/21/08, Roumen Petrov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alon Bar-Lev via RT wrote: Attached are patches, please address

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-10-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
I did not wish to do anything special except of fixing mingw, so I drop the LEAN_AND_MEAN fixup. Latest snapshot added obj_xref.h, so the depend target can stay the same. Attached is the only fix needed for making domd use cross compiler, as it fails because of the -mno-cygwin. And optional fix I

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-10-30 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
there is some solution for win64 users and not require to keep syncing with CVS head. I use: ./Configure --prefix=// --cross-compile-prefix=x86_64-pc-mingw32- no-zlib shared mingw64 no-capieng Thank you, Alon Bar-Lev. diff -urNp openssl-SNAP-20081003/Configure openssl-SNAP-20081003.mingw64/Configure

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-10-30 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
]. Attached is a new patch. Thank you, Alon Bar-Lev. [1] http://www.opensc-project.org/build/browser/trunk/mingw64 [2] http://www.opensc-project.org/build/browser/trunk diff -urNp openssl-SNAP-20081003/Configure openssl-SNAP-20081003.mingw64/Configure --- openssl-SNAP-20081003/Configure 2008-09-16 00

[openssl.org #1771] CVS Head crypto/jpake/Makefile - missing install rule?

2008-10-31 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
making install in crypto/jpake... make[2]: Entering directory `/home/alonbl/tmp/Development/opensc/build/trunk/tmp/openssl-SNAP-20081028/crypto/jpake' __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org

Re: [openssl.org #1771] CVS Head crypto/jpake/Makefile - missing install rule?

2008-10-31 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
On 10/31/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also string.h is missing. On 10/31/08, Alon Bar-Lev via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: making install in crypto/jpake... make[2]: Entering directory `/home/alonbl/tmp/Development/opensc/build/trunk/tmp/openssl-SNAP-20081028/crypto

Re: [openssl.org #1771] CVS Head crypto/jpake/Makefile - missing install rule?

2008-10-31 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Forgot the attachment to rt. Sorry for the noise. On 10/31/08, Alon Bar-Lev via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/31/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also string.h is missing. On 10/31/08, Alon Bar-Lev via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: making install in crypto/jpake

Re: [openssl.org #1693] Compiling OpenSSL with mingw-w64

2008-10-31 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
On 10/31/08, Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please test the other suggested bn_lcl.h modification? While you're on it... I cannot actually test it... I can compile and users may test. I don't have a win64 machine. And I don't know how exactly I can check for speed... I

[openssl.org #1777] [SNAPSHOT] Some size_t issues

2008-11-05 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Attached a fix. --- openssl-SNAP-20081104/crypto/bn/bn_asm.c 2008-11-02 21:00:07.0 +0200 +++ openssl-SNAP-20081104.new/crypto/bn/bn_asm.c 2008-11-05 21:28:48.0 +0200 @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ #if defined(BN_LLONG) || defined(BN_UMULT_HIGH) -BN_ULONG bn_mul_add_words(BN_ULONG *rp,

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

2008-11-28 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Please merge. On 11/23/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I finish the tests with native build (MSYS environment): The source tree contain recent version (2008-11-23) plus patches: from ticket 1747: - openssl-cvs-mingw-capi.patch.gz last from this ticket(1753

[openssl.org #2125] [PATCH] Fixup compilation for gcc-aix target

2009-12-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
sltest.c:157:1: error: _XOPEN_SOURCE redefined In file included from /opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.0/include/assert.h:64, from ssltest.c:146: /usr/include/standards.h:114:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition make: 1254-004 The error code from the last

[openssl.org #2137] [PATCH] mingw fixups

2010-01-12 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
The following is required in order to make beta4 compile using mingw (w64). Every time there is #include windows.h some symbols should be removed. Also, there is no need to #include windows.h if e_os2.h was included. --- diff -urNp openssl-1.0.0-beta4.org/crypto/rand/rand.h

Re: [openssl.org #2137] [PATCH] mingw fixups

2010-01-12 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Bar-Lev via RT wrote: The following is required in order to make beta4 compile using mingw (w64). Every time there is #includewindows.h  some symbols should be removed. Also, there is no need to #includewindows.h  if e_os2.h was included. [SNIP] diff -urNp openssl-1.0.0-beta4.org/e_os.h

[openssl.org #1451] Re: PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2006-12-28 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
-static declaration a.c:1: error: previous declaration of ‘aaa’ was here So I removed the static from the macro. I had to do some more modifications. Please review. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. --- diff -urNp openssl-SNAP-20061228.org/engines/ccgost/Makefile openssl-SNAP-20061228/engines/ccgost

Re: [openssl.org #2137] [PATCH] mingw fixups

2010-01-14 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
You are right. I tried latest snapshot and it compiles OK as far as mingw 32 and 64 concerned. Had to fix some code in apps though, this why I don't use snapshots. You can close this. Alon On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Roumen Petrov via RT r...@openssl.org wrote: Hi Alon, Alon Bar-Lev

[openssl.org #2282] [PATCH] Add PVK to usage of rsa and dsa commands

2010-06-02 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Although I knew PVK is supported... Could not find how to use it... Tested on snapshot of 20100602. openssl-1.0.0-pvk-usage.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [openssl.org #2282] AutoReply: [PATCH] Add PVK to usage of rsa and dsa commands

2012-03-17 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
ping? this should be trivial. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager

[openssl.org #2459] ecdsa_method declaration prevents use in implementing a dynamic engine

2013-09-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Hi, Just wanted to note that finish is also required to allow cleaning up resources. Any ETA on this? very important if we want to use ec based hardware cryptography. Thanks, Alon Bar-Lev __ OpenSSL Project

[openssl.org #2459] ecdsa_method declaration prevents use in implementing a dynamic engine

2013-09-19 Thread Alon Bar-Lev via RT
Hi, Any ETA for this? Just wanted to note that finish is also required to allow cleaning up resources. Any ETA on this? very important if we want to use ec based hardware cryptography. Thanks, Alon Bar-Lev __ OpenSSL Project