Hello.
I'm studying some parts of the OpenSSL code and I now have a question.
In ssl/ssl_locl.h, I'm wandering if the #define SSL_ENC_MASK is right.
Before the Camellia was added (0.9.8b), we had :
#define SSL_ENC_MASK 0x0*4*3F8000L
In 0.9.8c:
#define SSL_ENC_MASK 0x0*C*3F8000L
From 4 to C -
Thanks Mounir but you didn't exactly answer my question.
I noticed Camellia and SEED. My question was about how to define the
mask according to a new cipher.
That's why I've already taken a look at the last 2 entries.
However, if a new algorithm makes it in OpenSSL, what would the mask be ?
I
understood.
Thanks.
Mounir IDRASSI a écrit :
The bit flag for a new algorithm would logically be 0x2000 and the
next 0x4000. Thus, the value of the mask would be 0x3C3F8000L and
0x7C3F8000L respectively.
__
Hello.
Simple question, is it mandatory to declare the cbc, ecb, cfb, ofb for
each cipher or is it possible to only declare and implement some of them
(let's say ecb and cbc) ?
Regards,
Grégory BELLIER.
__
OpenSSL
-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Gregory BELLIER
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:45 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Ciphers and modes of operation
Hello.
Simple question, is it mandatory to declare the cbc, ecb, cfb, ofb for
each cipher or is it possible
enough information so you could be able to give me a hand.
Regards,
Grégory BELLIER.
Cheng, Weidong a écrit :
Please give more information as Stephen suggested.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Gregory BELLIER
I forgot to mention that what I do is based on OpenSSL-0.9.8l
Grégory.
Cheng, Weidong a écrit :
Please give more information as Stephen suggested.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Gregory BELLIER
Sent
Dr. Stephen Henson a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010, Gregory BELLIER wrote:
Hello Weidong and Stephen,
So please, if you have time, take a look at this code sample, maybe you'll
notice something in just a glance.
#define BLOCK_CIPHER_def_dyna(cname, nmode, mode, MODE, kstruct, nid
, you needn’t to worry about what you have
missed to fill up.
Weidong
*From:* owner-openssl-...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] *On Behalf Of *Gregory BELLIER
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:07 AM
Hello,
I added a cipher in OpenSSL and NSS. I would like to send an email with
SMTPs from a modified Thunderbird (because of NSS) to a postfix.
The TLS negociation is between NSS and OpenSSL.
However, I get the following error:
Mar 18 19:40:15 pico postfix/smtpd[3842]: SSL3 alert
Tim Hudson a écrit :
Gregory BELLIER wrote:
I added a cipher in OpenSSL and NSS. I would like to send an email
with SMTPs from a modified Thunderbird (because of NSS) to a postfix.
The TLS negociation is between NSS and OpenSSL.
[snip]
Do you have any hint in what could be wrong?
Use
Hi all !
I'm currently playing with openssl-0.9.8o to add a cipher in it (just for
fun).
I noticed in crypto/objects that 2 files (obj_dat.h and obj_mac.h) are
automatically generated from scripts which read obj_mac.num and objects.txt.
Therefore I did not update manually obj_dat.h and
Le 21/09/2010 17:57, Martin Kaiser a écrit :
Thus wrote Gregory Bellier (gregory.bell...@gmail.com):
I noticed in crypto/objects that 2 files (obj_dat.h and obj_mac.h) are
automatically generated from scripts which read obj_mac.num and objects.txt.
Therefore I did not update manually
2010/9/22 Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Gregory Bellier wrote:
Hi all !
I'm currently playing with openssl-0.9.8o to add a cipher in it (just for
fun).
I noticed in crypto/objects that 2 files (obj_dat.h and obj_mac.h) are
automatically generated from
2010/9/29 Micah Anderson via RT r...@openssl.org
According to RFC 4945 § 5.1.3.12 section title ExtendedKeyUsage[0] the
following extended key usage has been added:
... this document defines an ExtendedKeyUsage keyPurposeID that MAY be
used to limit a certificate's use:
15 matches
Mail list logo
