Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4323] chacha-armv4.pl bugs

2016-02-22 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
> The fix seems to work. On related note, a problem was reported with poly1305-armv4 module, which was traced down to assembler (different versions disagree about how to treat #-1 as argument to vmov.i64). If you run into problem, don't panic, fix is upcoming... -- Ticket here:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4323] chacha-armv4.pl bugs

2016-02-22 Thread David Benjamin via RT
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:27 PM Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: > Hi, > > > The partial-block tail code in chacha-armv4.pl also seems to have > problems. > > My colleague Steven and I made an attempt to debug it, but we're not > > familiar enough with ARM to fix it. > > > > From

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4323] chacha-armv4.pl bugs

2016-02-21 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
Hi, > The partial-block tail code in chacha-armv4.pl also seems to have problems. > My colleague Steven and I made an attempt to debug it, but we're not > familiar enough with ARM to fix it. > > From playing with it in a debugger, it doesn't look like @t[3] contains the > length. We suspect