> Thanks for the explanations.
>
> In the code I am working with, I see:
> $ sed -n '657p' openssl-1.0.2h/crypto/cryptlib.c
> unsigned long *OPENSSL_ia32cap_loc(void)
>
> You may want to verify it.
Right! Sorry about confusion, my bad! It was long in 1.0.x and in became
int in master. Anyway,
;
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:32:19 PM
To: Loic Etienne
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4568] Enhancement request: Capability
vector accessor function for arm and ppc
> Two more observations.
>
> OPENSSL_ia32cap_loc() alters the underlying OPENSSL_ia32
> Two more observations.
>
> OPENSSL_ia32cap_loc() alters the underlying OPENSSL_ia32cap_P, the bits not
> fitting into the expected integer size being zeroed. I do not know if it is
> practically relevant, but it is strange that a read has side effects. It
> would be a good reason for
r step.
From: Salz, Rich via RT <r...@openssl.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 6:41:02 PM
To: Loic Etienne
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4568] Enhancement request: Capability
vector accessor function for arm and ppc
Doesn't it make more s
.
From: Salz, Rich via RT <r...@openssl.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 6:41:02 PM
To: Loic Etienne
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4568] Enhancement request: Capability
vector accessor function for arm and ppc
Doesn't it make more sense to have a
Doesn't it make more sense to have a single API that returns the
platform-specific flags?
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4568
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
