Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
* The current patch ( PR 5164 ) just changes "can be safely used" to "can generally be used safely". Without enough information for a user of the library to know whether a given usage is safe, this isn't useful documentation. When it comes to threading, "generally safe" is the same as

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Wim Lewis
On 24. jan. 2018, at 6:11 f.h., Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev wrote: > On 01/23/2018 07:19 PM, Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote: >> Well, the most likely fix is to make the “safely” wording be more vague, >> which I doubt you’ll like. But I doubt anyone on the team

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
* Well, the most likely fix is to make the “safely” wording be more vague, which I doubt you’ll like. But I doubt anyone on the team has much interest in fixing 1.0.2 locking issues. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5164 -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
* OpenSSL should provide API to retrieve extension by OID. Yes! Can you open a github issue for that? -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Yun Jiang
by OID. Yun From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Salz, Rich via openssl-dev Sent: 24 January 2018 14:40 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c Create the OID at your

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
o:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Peter Waltenberg Sent: 24 January 2018 01:23 To: Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>; openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c It's also not that much of a problem in pra

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-dev
On 01/23/2018 07:19 PM, Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote: > > * OpenSSL APIs, which makes the following OpenSSL documentation > statement invalid > (https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/crypto/threads.html > >

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Yun Jiang
January 2018 01:23 To: Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>; openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c It's also not that much of a problem in practice.. If you are using those API's you are adding new crypto. methods.

Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c

2018-01-24 Thread Yun Jiang
Thanks! Is this issue fixed in 1.1.0? Yun From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Salz, Rich via openssl-dev Sent: 24 January 2018 01:19 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] About multi-thread unsafe for APIs defined in crypto/objects/obj_dat.c