"Salz, Rich" skrev: (11 februari 2018 14:07:13 CET)
>> Those same systems will probably not have the newest OpenSSL
>either,
>and OpenSSH on those machines will certainly not be linked with a
>newer OpenSSL...
>
>I apologize for not being clear enough.
>
>I do
> So we should tread with some care. Perhaps the software-only Blowfish
is fast enough, but my point is that Blowfish is much less of an obvious
outdated cipher than the others...
That's a different point. I still don't agree. The difference between
hand-tuned assembler and C
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 2:20 AM, Richard Levitte wrote:
>
> Those same systems will probably not have the newest OpenSSL either,
> and OpenSSH on those machines will certainly not be linked with a
> newer OpenSSL...
It is not those systems, but other systems that need to
> Those same systems will probably not have the newest OpenSSL either,
and OpenSSH on those machines will certainly not be linked with a
newer OpenSSL...
I apologize for not being clear enough.
I do not want to remove any of those algorithms. I just want to remove 10,000
lines