Re: [openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

2018-06-26 Thread Matt Caswell
On 26/06/18 20:43, Salz, Rich wrote: > That's interesting. Would we put a bugfix in 1.1.0, not put the fix in 1.1.1 > until our first "a" release? > > Or are you saying that if it's in 1.1.0, then we don't have to fix it until > after 1.1.1 comes out? That seems justifiable to me. The latte

Re: [openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

2018-06-26 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:43:45PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > That's interesting. Would we put a bugfix in 1.1.0, not put the fix in 1.1.1 > until our first "a" release? > > Or are you saying that if it's in 1.1.0, then we don't have to fix it until > after 1.1.1 comes out? That seems justifia

Re: [openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

2018-06-26 Thread Salz, Rich
That's interesting. Would we put a bugfix in 1.1.0, not put the fix in 1.1.1 until our first "a" release? Or are you saying that if it's in 1.1.0, then we don't have to fix it until after 1.1.1 comes out? That seems justifiable to me. On 6/26/18, 3:32 PM, "Matt Caswell" wrote:

Re: [openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

2018-06-26 Thread Matt Caswell
On 26/06/18 18:18, Salz, Rich wrote: > So are you saying look at the 73 open issues at > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/milestone/9 and re-evaluate them? Exactly. My guess is that a significant proportion of them also apply to 1.1.0 and therefore should not hold up the 1.1.1 release. At the

[openssl-project] FW: [openssl-commits] Build failed in Jenkins: master_noec #574

2018-06-26 Thread Salz, Rich
FYI On 6/26/18, 2:45 PM, "Barry Fussell (bfussell)" wrote: The evp_test is failing intermittently because there is an attempt to malloc zero bytes when running the new test that came in with this commit. https://bitbucket-eng-rtp1.cisco.com/bitbucket/projects/TS/repos/cisc

Re: [openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

2018-06-26 Thread Salz, Rich
So are you saying look at the 73 open issues at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/milestone/9 and re-evaluate them? On 6/26/18, 11:56 AM, "Matt Caswell" wrote: I'm thinking that we should maybe re-asses the current milestones in github. We currently use the following milestones

Re: [openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

2018-06-26 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 04:56:26PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > I'm thinking that we should maybe re-asses the current milestones in github. > > We currently use the following milestones: > > Assessed - Anything against this milestone isn't relevant to the 1.1.1 > release (e.g. 1.0.2 specific iss

[openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

2018-06-26 Thread Matt Caswell
I'm thinking that we should maybe re-asses the current milestones in github. We currently use the following milestones: Assessed - Anything against this milestone isn't relevant to the 1.1.1 release (e.g. 1.0.2 specific issue) 1.1.1 - This is relevant to the 1.1.1 release but may not be specific