Re: [openssl-project] Release strategy updates & other policies

2018-09-26 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <73e9cd06-575e-4cde-b137-95179b07b...@dukhovni.org> on Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:24:11 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni said: > > > > On Sep 25, 2018, at 9:51 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > > 5.0.0 > > 5.0.1 (bug fix) > > 5.1.0 (add accessor) > > 6.0.0 (new feature) > >

Re: [openssl-project] Release strategy updates & other policies

2018-09-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 9:51 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: > > 5.0.0 > 5.0.1 (bug fix) > 5.1.0 (add accessor) > 6.0.0 (new feature) > 6.0.1 (bug fix) > 5.1.1 (bug fix)6.0.2 (bug fix) > 5.2.1 (add accessor) > 6.1.0 (add

Re: [openssl-project] Release strategy updates & other policies

2018-09-26 Thread Richard Levitte
Speaking of this, I've started on a document that explores the meaning of changes and releases. Its objective is to create discussion and debate, and hopefully, we will eventually be able to create a working policy with sufficient detail.

Re: [openssl-project] Release strategy updates & other policies

2018-09-26 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20180926165825.ga14...@roeckx.be> on Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:58:26 +0200, Kurt Roeckx said: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:13:53PM +1000, Tim Hudson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:07 PM Matt Caswell wrote: > > > > > On 25/09/18 10:58, Tim Hudson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018

Re: [openssl-project] Release strategy updates & other policies

2018-09-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:13:53PM +1000, Tim Hudson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:07 PM Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 25/09/18 10:58, Tim Hudson wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:23 PM Richard Levitte > > > wrote: > > > > > > So what you suggest (and

[openssl-project] Fwd: Release strategy updates & other policies

2018-09-26 Thread Matt Caswell
FYI Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [openssl-project] Release strategy updates & other policies Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:37:48 -0400 From: Michael Richardson To: Matt Caswell replying directly, because the list is closed, but this is not private. Matt Caswell wrote: