On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 03:17:25 +0200,
Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>
> * Is this workable or should something more significantly different be used
> before things freeze
> with the 3.0 release?
>
> Well, since you asked: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8377
For the record, I'm opposed to
* Is this workable or should something more significantly different be used
before things freeze with the 3.0 release?
Well, since you asked: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8377
On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 05:07:24 +0200,
Dr Paul Dale wrote:
>
>
> Richard wrote:
>
> With most OSSL_PARAM structure being dynamically created,
> the need for the indirection seems redundant. E.g. could the return
> length be moved into
> OSSL_PARAM? I think so.
>
>
