Dear Tim,
Formally I am a contributor with a signed CLA.
I took a code definitely permitting any usage without any feedback,
slightly modified it (at least by openssl-format-source and splitting
between header and source), and submitted it as my feedback to OpenSSL.
I still think that it will be
I will take the hint and stop commenting on this thread.
Hello,
I'd like to ask about improving SHA-256 performance:
I see on this page,
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/sha-256-implementations-paper.pdf
Intel gives a reference implementation of SHA-256 for its own processors.
How is OpenSSL's implementation
Previous assertions that if the license was compatible that we don't need a
CLA in order to accept a contribution were incorrect.
You are now questioning the entire purpose of contributor agreements and
effectively arguing they are superfluous and that our policy should be
different.
You are (of
Thank you for the reply.
>The license under which the OpenSSL software is provided does not require
>"permission" to be sought for use of the software.
See
The vote closed today, with the following result:
+1: 4
0: 3 (where one is a -0)
-1: 0
The vote passes.
Cheers,
Richard
On Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:01:59 +0200,
Richard Levitte wrote:
>
> topic: Remove function codes from error reporting functions as per PR#9058.
> comment: Discussed
