I am beginning to wonder whether it is a good idea to make the fact
whether a private header file contains exported symbols as selection
criterion for where the header file needs to go in the source tree:
> > - headers in `include/internal`
>
> For internal things that we want to make
> > ./crypto/include/internal/store.h
> > ./crypto/include/internal/store_int.h
> ...
>
> I have *no* idea why there are two header files. I must have
> forgotten about one of them when creating the other...
>
> They should be merged into one.
Ok, I can take care of it.
Matthias
Hello,
I'd like either _lcl.h or _local.h.
_locl.h seems weird to me :)
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 10:32 AM Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <
matthias.st.pie...@ncp-e.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> pull request #9274 started out as a task to clean up inconsistencies in
> the naming
> of the include guards. It
