Re: [openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week
>Well, the condition for this vote is a bit extraordinary as well. I couldn't in good conscience propose a week long vote, because that potentially would have the effect to push the release a week anyway, because the release would have to wait for the result of the vote. We didn't plan well enough, and we didn't give ourselves enough time to re-evaluate. That is, deciding to ship the schedule should have happened at least seven days before the next release. I think those are the key things we need to take away from this, not an attempt to change the voting process. ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
Re: [openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week
In message <20180310124318.ga26...@roeckx.be> on Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:43:18 +0100, Kurt Roeckx said: kurt> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:45:46AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: kurt> > Vote text: kurt> > kurt> > NOTE: THREE DAY VOTE kurt> > Why? Because beta1 is currently scheduled to be released in three kurt> > days. A longer voting period would hold the release hostage in kurt> > practice, and thereby force a push of the release date regardless of kurt> > the vote result. kurt> kurt> As explained by Rich on the OMC list, we can't have that. I assume kurt> it's a 1 week vote. But the vote can be closed earlier. Well, the condition for this vote is a bit extraordinary as well. I couldn't in good conscience propose a week long vote, because that potentially would have the effect to push the release a week anyway, because the release would have to wait for the result of the vote. Basically, it's a catch 22 that noone thought of... Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
Re: [openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:45:46AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > Vote text: > > NOTE: THREE DAY VOTE > Why? Because beta1 is currently scheduled to be released in three > days. A longer voting period would hold the release hostage in > practice, and thereby force a push of the release date regardless of > the vote result. As explained by Rich on the OMC list, we can't have that. I assume it's a 1 week vote. But the vote can be closed earlier. Kurt ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
[openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week
I started a vote moments ago on the OMC list with the content that follows. The OMC will vote on it, hopefully on time, and the resulting tally will be posted here. Vote text: NOTE: THREE DAY VOTE Why? Because beta1 is currently scheduled to be released in three days. A longer voting period would hold the release hostage in practice, and thereby force a push of the release date regardless of the vote result. -- topic: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week Reason: we have a number of unreviewed PRs on github marked 1.1.1 and time is getting short. All other current future release dates will be pushed one week as well. https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html will be updated. An official announcement should be made. Proposed by Richard Levitte Public: yes opened: 2018-03-10 closed: -mm-dd THREE DAY VOTE! -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
Re: [openssl-project] External contributors and the next release
Am 07.03.2018 um 02:20 schrieb Salz, Rich: > > I think we should make sure to set aside time to review as many of the > non-project pull requests as possible. I think it is important to > show a commitment to the larger community. > > > > One way to do this is to say that we will extend the BETA date by a > week, and in that week no new code from the team, only third-party > existing pull requests will be considered > > Will there be an official announcement of the prolongation and/or an update to https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html? Matthias ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project