Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Matt Caswell
On 29/03/18 11:06, Matt Caswell wrote: > "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed > during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members approve the change" I started a vote with this text, and will report back here when I have the results. Matt __

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <4e32b364-3ed3-9101-158c-09338f96e...@openssl.org> on Thu, 29 Mar > 2018 11:06:46 +0100, Matt Caswell said: > > matt> How about this for the vote text: > matt> > matt> "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLS

Re: [openssl-project] to fully overlap or not to

2018-03-29 Thread Andy Polyakov
On 03/09/18 17:13, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > On 03/08/18 12:06, Andy Polyakov wrote: >> >>> Andy pointed out that my last e-mail was probably not clear enough. >>> >>> I want to drop the current partially overlapping checks >>> on the WRAP mode ciphers (which were ineffective anyways). >>> >>> And al

Re: [openssl-project] Is making tests faster a bugfix?

2018-03-29 Thread Tim Hudson
Improved testing to me is something that is a good thing - and a value judgement. It doesn't change libcrypto or libssl - and that to me is the way I think of it. Fixing tests and apps and Makefiles to me are different from adding features to libcrypto or libssl. On this one - the fuzz testing has

Re: [openssl-project] Is making tests faster a bugfix?

2018-03-29 Thread Richard Levitte
In message on Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:03:06 +0100, Matt Caswell said: matt> matt> matt> On 29/03/18 14:00, Salz, Rich wrote: matt> > Please see https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5788 matt> > matt> > I don’t think it is, but I’d like to know what others think. matt> matt> I do think this s

Re: [openssl-project] Is making tests faster a bugfix?

2018-03-29 Thread Matt Caswell
On 29/03/18 14:00, Salz, Rich wrote: > Please see https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5788 > > I don’t think it is, but I’d like to know what others think. I do think this should be applied. The tests in question are not just slow but *really* slow to the point that I often exit them before

[openssl-project] Is making tests faster a bugfix?

2018-03-29 Thread Salz, Rich
Please see https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5788 I don’t think it is, but I’d like to know what others think. ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Salz, Rich
>"Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members approve the change" Fine. Please run the vote soon as there is not much time. ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-pr

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <4e32b364-3ed3-9101-158c-09338f96e...@openssl.org> on Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:06:46 +0100, Matt Caswell said: matt> How about this for the vote text: matt> matt> "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed matt> during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

2018-03-29 Thread Matt Caswell
On 27/03/18 17:07, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 27/03/18 14:00, Salz, Rich wrote: >> Discussion seems to have stalled out on this.  Please review >> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary. >> >>   >> >> Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy? > > I thin