date:20200501

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

2020-05-01 Thread Matt Caswell

This is really nice! Thanks Mark.

Matt

On 01/05/2020 08:52, Mark J Cox wrote:
> Last month I started a script to ping stale PRs that were in certain
> states.  The script has also been collecting statistics (trending and
> snapshot).  I intend to post this monthly and after a few months with
> trends and commentary.
> 
> PRs that have not had any updates in the last 30 days and are not WIP:
> 
> all  ( 148 issues, median  188  days) of which:
> 
>   failed CI  ( 23 issues, median  175  days)
>   deferred after 1.1.1  ( 41 issues, median  188  days)
>   cla required  ( 19 issues, median  422  days)
>   waiting for reporter  ( 15 issues, median  275  days)
>   waiting for review  ( 1 issues, median  38  days)
>   waiting for OMC  ( 2 issues, median  112.0  days)
>   waiting for OTC  ( 1 issues, median  84  days)
>   all other  ( 46 issues, median  239.5  days)
> 
> So, ignoring deferred issues too you could summarise this as:
> 
> Stale PRs waiting for us to do something: 27 (last months: 29)
> Stale PRs waiting for the reporter to do something: 34 (last months: 37)
> Stale PRs with unclear next action: 46 (last months: 42)
> 
> Over time I hope we can triage the "all other" PRs with labels so we
> know what the next action is on each one.
> 
> Details:
> 
> failed CI  ( 23 issues, median  175  days)
> 
> 11349 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:43
> 11327 reviewed:commented days:48
> 11288 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:51
> 11257 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:49
> 11195 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:commented days:38
> 11151  days:60
> 10626  days:66
> 10556  days:147
> 10465  days:164
> 9926  days:226
> 9603  days:226
> 9155 reviewed:commented days:100
> 8955 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:dismissed days:175
> 8687 reviewed:commented days:210
> 8389  days:415
> 8115 reviewed:commented days:48
> 7921 reviewed:commented days:419
> 7914 reviewed:approved days:478
> 7380 reviewed:commented days:566
> 7051 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:615
> 6074 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:658
> 4992 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:188
> 4486 milestone:Assessed,  days:658
> 
> waiting for reporter  ( 15 issues, median  275  days)
> 
> 11310 reviewed:changes_requested days:43
> 10887 branch: master, reviewed:changes_requested days:37
> 10590 reviewed:changes_requested days:115
> 9677 branch: master, reviewed:changes_requested days:32
> 9575 reviewed:changes_requested days:262
> 9461 reviewed:changes_requested days:275
> 9427 reviewed:changes_requested days:282
> 9243 reviewed:changes_requested days:284
> 9240 reviewed:changes_requested days:309
> 8992 reviewed:changes_requested days:226
> 8962 reviewed:changes_requested days:44
> 8730 reviewed:changes_requested days:323
> 8674 reviewed:changes_requested days:378
> 7961 reviewed:changes_requested days:480
> 7432 reviewed:changes_requested days:559
> 
> waiting for OMC  ( 2 issues, median  112.0  days)
> 
> 10786 approval: done, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, hold: need
> omc decision, reviewed:approved days:52
> 10195 branch: master, hold: need omc decision, reviewed:commented days:172
> 
> waiting for OTC  ( 1 issues, median  84  days)
> 
> 8300 approval: otc review pending, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master,
> hold: need otc decision, reviewed:approved days:84
> 
> waiting for review  ( 1 issues, median  38  days)
> 
> 10587 approval: review pending, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master,
> reviewed:commented days:38
> 
> all other  ( 46 issues, median  239.5  days)
> 
> 11398 approval: done, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:35
> 11312  days:47
> 11277 resolved: not a bug,  days:50
> 11260 reviewed:commented days:55
> 11154  days:66
> 5  days:56
> 11057  days:80
> 10884  days:102
> 10818  days:108
> 10570 reviewed:commented days:124
> 10541  days:139
> 10338 reviewed:commented days:179
> 10320 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:commented days:170
> 10298  days:183
> 10268  days:185
> 10037  days:147
> 9655  days:157
> 9554  days:266
> 9421 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:121
> 9223 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:83
> 9206  days:314
> 9051 reviewed:commented days:177
> 8956  days:336
> 8920  days:213
> 8908  days:351
> 8862  days:330
> 8835  days:370
> 8743 branch: master,  days:381
> 8668  days:392
> 8455  days:394
> 8420  days:395
> 8333  days:430
> 8309 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:316
> 8024 reviewed:commented days:81
> 7688  days:516
> 7615  days:520
> 7454 reviewed:commented days:471
> 7274 reviewed:approved days:322
> 7225 reviewed:commented days:587
> 6725 milestone:Assessed,

Stale PR stats @May01

2020-05-01 Thread Mark J Cox

Last month I started a script to ping stale PRs that were in certain
states.  The script has also been collecting statistics (trending and
snapshot).  I intend to post this monthly and after a few months with
trends and commentary.

PRs that have not had any updates in the last 30 days and are not WIP:

all  ( 148 issues, median  188  days) of which:

  failed CI  ( 23 issues, median  175  days)
  deferred after 1.1.1  ( 41 issues, median  188  days)
  cla required  ( 19 issues, median  422  days)
  waiting for reporter  ( 15 issues, median  275  days)
  waiting for review  ( 1 issues, median  38  days)
  waiting for OMC  ( 2 issues, median  112.0  days)
  waiting for OTC  ( 1 issues, median  84  days)
  all other  ( 46 issues, median  239.5  days)

So, ignoring deferred issues too you could summarise this as:

Stale PRs waiting for us to do something: 27 (last months: 29)
Stale PRs waiting for the reporter to do something: 34 (last months: 37)
Stale PRs with unclear next action: 46 (last months: 42)

Over time I hope we can triage the "all other" PRs with labels so we
know what the next action is on each one.

Details:

failed CI  ( 23 issues, median  175  days)

11349 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:43
11327 reviewed:commented days:48
11288 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:51
11257 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:49
11195 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:commented days:38
11151  days:60
10626  days:66
10556  days:147
10465  days:164
9926  days:226
9603  days:226
9155 reviewed:commented days:100
8955 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:dismissed days:175
8687 reviewed:commented days:210
8389  days:415
8115 reviewed:commented days:48
7921 reviewed:commented days:419
7914 reviewed:approved days:478
7380 reviewed:commented days:566
7051 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:615
6074 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:658
4992 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:188
4486 milestone:Assessed,  days:658

waiting for reporter  ( 15 issues, median  275  days)

11310 reviewed:changes_requested days:43
10887 branch: master, reviewed:changes_requested days:37
10590 reviewed:changes_requested days:115
9677 branch: master, reviewed:changes_requested days:32
9575 reviewed:changes_requested days:262
9461 reviewed:changes_requested days:275
9427 reviewed:changes_requested days:282
9243 reviewed:changes_requested days:284
9240 reviewed:changes_requested days:309
8992 reviewed:changes_requested days:226
8962 reviewed:changes_requested days:44
8730 reviewed:changes_requested days:323
8674 reviewed:changes_requested days:378
7961 reviewed:changes_requested days:480
7432 reviewed:changes_requested days:559

waiting for OMC  ( 2 issues, median  112.0  days)

10786 approval: done, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, hold: need
omc decision, reviewed:approved days:52
10195 branch: master, hold: need omc decision, reviewed:commented days:172

waiting for OTC  ( 1 issues, median  84  days)

8300 approval: otc review pending, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master,
hold: need otc decision, reviewed:approved days:84

waiting for review  ( 1 issues, median  38  days)

10587 approval: review pending, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master,
reviewed:commented days:38

all other  ( 46 issues, median  239.5  days)

11398 approval: done, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:35
11312  days:47
11277 resolved: not a bug,  days:50
11260 reviewed:commented days:55
11154  days:66
5  days:56
11057  days:80
10884  days:102
10818  days:108
10570 reviewed:commented days:124
10541  days:139
10338 reviewed:commented days:179
10320 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:commented days:170
10298  days:183
10268  days:185
10037  days:147
9655  days:157
9554  days:266
9421 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:121
9223 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:83
9206  days:314
9051 reviewed:commented days:177
8956  days:336
8920  days:213
8908  days:351
8862  days:330
8835  days:370
8743 branch: master,  days:381
8668  days:392
8455  days:394
8420  days:395
8333  days:430
8309 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:316
8024 reviewed:commented days:81
7688  days:516
7615  days:520
7454 reviewed:commented days:471
7274 reviewed:approved days:322
7225 reviewed:commented days:587
6725 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:approved days:330
6518 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:approved days:681
6516 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, milestone:Assessed,  days:681
6448 milestone:Assessed,  days:188
6219 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:approved days:719
5427 branch: master, milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:481
4487 milestone:Assessed,

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

2020-05-01 Thread Dmitry Belyavsky

Dear Mark,

Many thanks for your efforts!

And I also got an idea that ping comment leaves PRs out of this statistics
:)

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 10:53 AM Mark J Cox  wrote:

> Last month I started a script to ping stale PRs that were in certain
> states.  The script has also been collecting statistics (trending and
> snapshot).  I intend to post this monthly and after a few months with
> trends and commentary.
>
> PRs that have not had any updates in the last 30 days and are not WIP:
>
> all  ( 148 issues, median  188  days) of which:
>
>   failed CI  ( 23 issues, median  175  days)
>   deferred after 1.1.1  ( 41 issues, median  188  days)
>   cla required  ( 19 issues, median  422  days)
>   waiting for reporter  ( 15 issues, median  275  days)
>   waiting for review  ( 1 issues, median  38  days)
>   waiting for OMC  ( 2 issues, median  112.0  days)
>   waiting for OTC  ( 1 issues, median  84  days)
>   all other  ( 46 issues, median  239.5  days)
>
> So, ignoring deferred issues too you could summarise this as:
>
> Stale PRs waiting for us to do something: 27 (last months: 29)
> Stale PRs waiting for the reporter to do something: 34 (last months:
> 37)
> Stale PRs with unclear next action: 46 (last months: 42)
>
> Over time I hope we can triage the "all other" PRs with labels so we
> know what the next action is on each one.
>
> Details:
>
> failed CI  ( 23 issues, median  175  days)
>
> 11349 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:43
> 11327 reviewed:commented days:48
> 11288 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:51
> 11257 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:49
> 11195 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:commented days:38
> 11151  days:60
> 10626  days:66
> 10556  days:147
> 10465  days:164
> 9926  days:226
> 9603  days:226
> 9155 reviewed:commented days:100
> 8955 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:dismissed days:175
> 8687 reviewed:commented days:210
> 8389  days:415
> 8115 reviewed:commented days:48
> 7921 reviewed:commented days:419
> 7914 reviewed:approved days:478
> 7380 reviewed:commented days:566
> 7051 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:615
> 6074 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:658
> 4992 milestone:Assessed, reviewed:commented days:188
> 4486 milestone:Assessed,  days:658
>
> waiting for reporter  ( 15 issues, median  275  days)
>
> 11310 reviewed:changes_requested days:43
> 10887 branch: master, reviewed:changes_requested days:37
> 10590 reviewed:changes_requested days:115
> 9677 branch: master, reviewed:changes_requested days:32
> 9575 reviewed:changes_requested days:262
> 9461 reviewed:changes_requested days:275
> 9427 reviewed:changes_requested days:282
> 9243 reviewed:changes_requested days:284
> 9240 reviewed:changes_requested days:309
> 8992 reviewed:changes_requested days:226
> 8962 reviewed:changes_requested days:44
> 8730 reviewed:changes_requested days:323
> 8674 reviewed:changes_requested days:378
> 7961 reviewed:changes_requested days:480
> 7432 reviewed:changes_requested days:559
>
> waiting for OMC  ( 2 issues, median  112.0  days)
>
> 10786 approval: done, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, hold: need
> omc decision, reviewed:approved days:52
> 10195 branch: master, hold: need omc decision, reviewed:commented
> days:172
>
> waiting for OTC  ( 1 issues, median  84  days)
>
> 8300 approval: otc review pending, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master,
> hold: need otc decision, reviewed:approved days:84
>
> waiting for review  ( 1 issues, median  38  days)
>
> 10587 approval: review pending, branch: 1.1.1, branch: master,
> reviewed:commented days:38
>
> all other  ( 46 issues, median  239.5  days)
>
> 11398 approval: done, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:35
> 11312  days:47
> 11277 resolved: not a bug,  days:50
> 11260 reviewed:commented days:55
> 11154  days:66
> 5  days:56
> 11057  days:80
> 10884  days:102
> 10818  days:108
> 10570 reviewed:commented days:124
> 10541  days:139
> 10338 reviewed:commented days:179
> 10320 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:commented days:170
> 10298  days:183
> 10268  days:185
> 10037  days:147
> 9655  days:157
> 9554  days:266
> 9421 branch: 1.1.1, branch: master, reviewed:approved days:121
> 9223 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:83
> 9206  days:314
> 9051 reviewed:commented days:177
> 8956  days:336
> 8920  days:213
> 8908  days:351
> 8862  days:330
> 8835  days:370
> 8743 branch: master,  days:381
> 8668  days:392
> 8455  days:394
> 8420  days:395
> 8333  days:430
> 8309 branch: master, reviewed:commented days:316
> 8024 reviewed:commented days:81
> 7688  days:516
> 7615  days:520
> 7454 reviewed:commented days:471
> 7274 reviewed:approved days:322
>

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

2020-05-01 Thread Mark J Cox

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 PM Dmitry Belyavsky  wrote:
..
> And I also got an idea that ping comment leaves PRs out of this statistics :)

Thanks!  The script is designed to ignore the automated pings that it
creates itself so they themselves don't reset the dates and
artificially stop things being stale.  Instead they will hopefully
nudge folks into taking some action that will actually stop the PRs
being stale :))

Mark

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

2020-05-01 Thread Salz, Rich

This is great transparency info.

Failed CI's are a problem since it's often the fault of timeouts, or sometimes 
master is broken.  Any thoughts on how to handle that?

>So, ignoring deferred issues too you could summarise this as:

Stale PRs waiting for us to do something: 27 (last months: 29)
Stale PRs waiting for the reporter to do something: 34 (last months: 37)
Stale PRs with unclear next action: 46 (last months: 42)

It would be great to see median days on those, too.

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

2020-05-01 Thread Dmitry Belyavsky

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:19 PM Mark J Cox  wrote:

> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 PM Dmitry Belyavsky  wrote:
> ..
> > And I also got an idea that ping comment leaves PRs out of this
> statistics :)
>
> Thanks!  The script is designed to ignore the automated pings that it
> creates itself so they themselves don't reset the dates and
> artificially stop things being stale.  Instead they will hopefully
> nudge folks into taking some action that will actually stop the PRs
> being stale :))
>

Well, I see some Catch-22 elements here...

-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky

Re: OpenSSL version 3.0.0-alpha1 published

2020-05-01 Thread SHANE LONTIS

Thanks..

I will take a look.

Shane


> On 2 May 2020, at 2:20 am, Guido Vranken  wrote:
> 
> Reminder that in git master and 3.0.0, CAST5 gives the wrong output: 
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11459 
> 
>  (this proof of concept was made before you moved CAST5 to liblegacy, so just 
> put OSSL_PROVIDER_load(nullptr, "legacy"); in there to make it work)
> 
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:30 PM OpenSSL  > wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> 
>OpenSSL version 3.0 alpha 1 released
>
> 
>OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
>https://www.openssl.org/ 
> 
> 
>OpenSSL 3.0 is currently in alpha.
> 
>OpenSSL 3.0 alpha 1 has now been made available.
> 
>Note: This OpenSSL pre-release has been provided for testing ONLY.
>It should NOT be used for security critical purposes.
> 
>Specific notes on upgrading to OpenSSL 3.0 from previous versions, as well
>as known issues are available on the OpenSSL Wiki, here:
> 
> https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/OpenSSL_3.0 
> 
> 
>The alpha release is available for download via HTTPS and FTP from the
>following master locations (you can find the various FTP mirrors under
>https://www.openssl.org/source/mirror.html 
> ):
> 
>  * https://www.openssl.org/source/ 
> 
>  * ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/ 
> 
> 
>The distribution file name is:
> 
> o openssl-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>   Size: 9530120
>   SHA1 checksum:  4db145d3d9c9d7bfaa7b2a1fe1670f7a3781bb06
>   SHA256 checksum:  
> 9d5be9122194ad1d649254de5e72afd329252f134791389d0cef627b18ed9a57
> 
>The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
> 
> openssl sha1 openssl-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> openssl sha256 openssl-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> 
>Please download and check this $LABEL release as soon as possible.
>To report a bug, open an issue on GitHub:
> 
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues 
> 
> 
>Please check the release notes and mailing lists to avoid duplicate
>reports of known issues. (Of course, the source is also available
>on GitHub.)
> 
>Yours,
> 
>The OpenSSL Project Team.
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhlersmDwVrHlGQg52cTSbQ5gRJEFAl6hpQcACgkQ2cTSbQ5g
> RJHvtggAp7XIxm/00amD4TijQhJqMmGsj0RXqwAeSd0gWDQCf78GX4zMIW/tTgvk
> I3Mb67DsOR5gdPZN5TigyqRaXSIAzfb8ZT4Gs9lo/j8RUi5AmzT2RYexbRv6bF6E
> cQ0OabM3rk4qi4njTi/YD9YihO6/pv7tWZkkfPsN547bfm7p7fwCrEHw02En5IW8
> hyFhkpKfA3c8MEa96yLwjhkYRTAzUmxus/mNID+Ja3/VTCmHjd1c57SHFPq9noll
> Wqzhs3jEhluZKHpwmSSA0KQh1ph0kh6fnKLEn3Oge5dYV3P+JrFCRfDEMsI1Nb/F
> hIr11rxXNxtBRKUSlOUyJATZn0sV6g==
> =uRpM
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: OpenSSL version 3.0.0-alpha1 published

2020-05-01 Thread Guido Vranken

Reminder that in git master and 3.0.0, CAST5 gives the wrong output:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11459 (this proof of concept was
made before you moved CAST5 to liblegacy, so just put
OSSL_PROVIDER_load(nullptr, "legacy"); in there to make it work)

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:30 PM OpenSSL  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>OpenSSL version 3.0 alpha 1 released
>
>
>OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
>https://www.openssl.org/
>
>OpenSSL 3.0 is currently in alpha.
>
>OpenSSL 3.0 alpha 1 has now been made available.
>
>Note: This OpenSSL pre-release has been provided for testing ONLY.
>It should NOT be used for security critical purposes.
>
>Specific notes on upgrading to OpenSSL 3.0 from previous versions, as
> well
>as known issues are available on the OpenSSL Wiki, here:
>
> https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/OpenSSL_3.0
>
>The alpha release is available for download via HTTPS and FTP from the
>following master locations (you can find the various FTP mirrors under
>https://www.openssl.org/source/mirror.html):
>
>  * https://www.openssl.org/source/
>  * ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/
>
>The distribution file name is:
>
> o openssl-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>   Size: 9530120
>   SHA1 checksum:  4db145d3d9c9d7bfaa7b2a1fe1670f7a3781bb06
>   SHA256 checksum:
> 9d5be9122194ad1d649254de5e72afd329252f134791389d0cef627b18ed9a57
>
>The checksums were calculated using the following commands:
>
> openssl sha1 openssl-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz
> openssl sha256 openssl-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz
>
>Please download and check this $LABEL release as soon as possible.
>To report a bug, open an issue on GitHub:
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues
>
>Please check the release notes and mailing lists to avoid duplicate
>reports of known issues. (Of course, the source is also available
>on GitHub.)
>
>Yours,
>
>The OpenSSL Project Team.
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhlersmDwVrHlGQg52cTSbQ5gRJEFAl6hpQcACgkQ2cTSbQ5g
> RJHvtggAp7XIxm/00amD4TijQhJqMmGsj0RXqwAeSd0gWDQCf78GX4zMIW/tTgvk
> I3Mb67DsOR5gdPZN5TigyqRaXSIAzfb8ZT4Gs9lo/j8RUi5AmzT2RYexbRv6bF6E
> cQ0OabM3rk4qi4njTi/YD9YihO6/pv7tWZkkfPsN547bfm7p7fwCrEHw02En5IW8
> hyFhkpKfA3c8MEa96yLwjhkYRTAzUmxus/mNID+Ja3/VTCmHjd1c57SHFPq9noll
> Wqzhs3jEhluZKHpwmSSA0KQh1ph0kh6fnKLEn3Oge5dYV3P+JrFCRfDEMsI1Nb/F
> hIr11rxXNxtBRKUSlOUyJATZn0sV6g==
> =uRpM
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

Stale PR stats @May01

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

Re: Stale PR stats @May01

Re: OpenSSL version 3.0.0-alpha1 published

Re: OpenSSL version 3.0.0-alpha1 published

8 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information