Thanks Matt - cut-n-paste fumble on my part from the previous vote summary.
The tally should always equal the number of OMC members.
For: 6, against: 0, abstained 0, not voted: 1
Tim.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:11 AM Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 15/09/2020 23:10, Tim Hudson wrote:
> > The OMC
On 15/09/2020 23:10, Tim Hudson wrote:
> The OMC voted to:
>
> /Release stable branch on the second last Tuesday of the last month in
> each quarter as a regular cadence./
>
> The vote passed.
> For: 6, against: 9, abstained 0, not voted: 1
That should say against: 0
;-)
Matt
>
> Thanks,
The OMC voted to:
*Release stable branch on the second last Tuesday of the last month in each
quarter as a regular cadence.*
The vote passed.
For: 6, against: 9, abstained 0, not voted: 1
Thanks,
Tim.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The OpenSSL project team would like to announce the forthcoming release
of OpenSSL version 1.1.1h.
This release will be made available on Tuesday 22nd September 2020
between 1300-1700 UTC.
OpenSSL 1.1.h is a bug-fix release. There are no CVEs
On 14/09/2020 11:30, Matt Caswell wrote:
> In order to try and move this discussion forward I have made a concrete
> proposal for how we should formulate the various ideas in this thread
> into an actual style. Please see here:
>
> https://github.com/openssl/web/pull/194
I've updated this PR
I have started this vote and will report back when I have an answer.
Matt
On 14/09/2020 09:18, Matt Caswell wrote:
> Currently, 1.1.1 supports SM2 asymmetric encryption. Real world use of
> this is currently believed to be low (IIUC it is mainly useful for SM2
> in TLS, which we don't current
Concerning PR #4930:
Originally that PR was about extending support for PKCS#12 input in
apps, which meanwhile has been superseded mostly by OSSL_STORE.
I meanwhile carved out the most interesting remaining pieces of the PR
and contributed them separately.
I've just rebased and cleaned up the
> I fail to see why the milestones '3.0.0' / '3.0.0 beta1' must be 1:1
> with the '3.0 New Core + FIPS' project.
Sorry for the misunderstanding, Richard. I did not intend to mess around with
your project organization.
Since it was the only active GitHub project, I misinterpreted it as the
