Re: [openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week

2018-03-10 Thread Salz, Rich
>Well, the condition for this vote is a bit extraordinary as well. I couldn't in good conscience propose a week long vote, because that potentially would have the effect to push the release a week anyway, because the release would have to wait for the result of the vote. We

Re: [openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week

2018-03-10 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20180310124318.ga26...@roeckx.be> on Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:43:18 +0100, Kurt Roeckx said: kurt> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:45:46AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: kurt> > Vote text: kurt> > kurt> > NOTE: THREE DAY VOTE kurt> > Why? Because beta1 is currently scheduled

Re: [openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week

2018-03-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:45:46AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > Vote text: > > NOTE: THREE DAY VOTE > Why? Because beta1 is currently scheduled to be released in three > days. A longer voting period would hold the release hostage in > practice, and thereby force a push of the release date

[openssl-project] VOTE report: Push the release of 1.1.1 beta1 (pre3) forward one week

2018-03-10 Thread Richard Levitte
I started a vote moments ago on the OMC list with the content that follows. The OMC will vote on it, hopefully on time, and the resulting tally will be posted here. Vote text: NOTE: THREE DAY VOTE Why? Because beta1 is currently scheduled to be released in three days. A longer voting period

Re: [openssl-project] External contributors and the next release

2018-03-10 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
Am 07.03.2018 um 02:20 schrieb Salz, Rich: > > I think we should make sure to set aside time to review as many of the > non-project pull requests as possible. I think it is important to > show a commitment to the larger community. > > > > One way to do this is to say that we will extend the