Re: [openssl-project] rule-based building attributes

> appro> How about this. We have touched this when discussing windows-makefile. > I > appro> mean when I called it VC-specific, you disagreed, and I said that > appro> embedding manifest effectively makes it VC-specific. In the context I > appro> also suggested post-link stage, a command one

[openssl-project] FW: [openssl/openssl] Free allow null (#5761)

Someone want to make the PR ? From: Andy Polyakov Reply-To: openssl/openssl Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 4:07 PM To: openssl/openssl

Re: [openssl-project] Speeding up the fuzz test...

> On Mar 27, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Richard Levitte wrote: > > Now, I wonder how that will impact on Kurt, who sometimes produce > these files, and on Google's oss-fuzz project, who do use this. > My desire is to replace the current corpora with the corresponding > cpio files,

Re: [openssl-project] Speeding up the fuzz test...

Neat. What does CPIO have over TAR? Is it better enough that it is a compelling reason to introduce yet another file format? ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

[openssl-project] Speeding up the fuzz test...

Hey, Matt and I talked a bit about the fuzz test recipe and how *incredibly* slow it is, especially on all things Windows. We realised fairly quickly that this is caused by a gazillion program invokations (once for every corpora file, that's more than 15000 of them), and then we started thinking

Re: [openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

On 27/03/18 14:00, Salz, Rich wrote: > Discussion seems to have stalled out on this.  Please review > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary. > >   > > Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy? I think that is ok and doesn't stray too far from what we

Re: [openssl-project] Repo frozen

The release is complete and the repo is unfrozen. Thanks to Richard yet again for all your help. Matt On 27/03/18 10:08, Matt Caswell wrote: > In case anyone was wondering the repo is currently frozen. > > Matt > ___ openssl-project mailing list

[openssl-project] OpenSSL version 1.1.0h published

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OpenSSL version 1.1.0h released === OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS https://www.openssl.org/ The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version 1.1.0h of our open

[openssl-project] OpenSSL version 1.0.2o published

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OpenSSL version 1.0.2o released === OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS https://www.openssl.org/ The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.2o of our open

[openssl-project] About PR 5702, etc.

Discussion seems to have stalled out on this. Please review https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary. Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy? I don’t know, but I think it will take too long to get to a decision. Is anyone (on the OMC) going to take that