Re: [openssl-project] Current votes FYI

2018-05-23 Thread Salz, Rich
Dang, you’re right. I’ll re-run the vote. But for now I reverted the website commit. From: Tim Hudson Reply-To: "openssl-project@openssl.org" Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 5:00 PM To: "openssl-project@openssl.org"

Re: [openssl-project] Current votes FYI

2018-05-23 Thread Tim Hudson
No that vote does not pass. All votes require participation by a majority of active members. Failure to have a majority participation causes a vote to fail. With only three out of eight members voting this vote simply did not pass. Tim. On Thu, 24 May 2018, 12:59 am Salz, Rich,

Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging

2018-05-23 Thread Matt Caswell
On 23/05/18 16:50, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:12:30PM +, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote: >>> So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious. >> >> At the beginnning, I tried to use ghmerge but it was not flexible >> enough for my needs. In

Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging

2018-05-23 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
> But I am curious if we currently do and/or should have a commit hook on > git.openssl.org to reject commits that start with "!fixup". We probably don't, but it's a good idea to have it. Matthias ___ openssl-project mailing list

Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging

2018-05-23 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:12:30PM +, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote: > > So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious. > > At the beginnning, I tried to use ghmerge but it was not flexible > enough for my needs. In particular, it only gives me the choice > between

Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging

2018-05-23 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
> +1 for python! :) Well, if this is a "go for it"... ;-) Oh, and I forgot to mention 'ghtool cherry-pick {110,102}' ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging

2018-05-23 Thread Salz, Rich
>Unfortunately, I didn't have time to follow my vision yet. Also, it would > have been easier for me to do it in Python than in Perl. +1 for python! :) ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org

[openssl-project] Some failing builds in travis?

2018-05-23 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
https://travis-ci.org/openssl/openssl/jobs/382694134 https://api.travis-ci.org/v3/job/382694134/log.txt Test Summary Report --- ../test/recipes/70-test_comp.t (Wstat: 26624 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 104 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP

Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging

2018-05-23 Thread Matt Caswell
On 23/05/18 01:43, Salz, Rich wrote: > > I do the same, but I am reluctant having a script doing it for me using > some fixed recipe... > >>I'm happy doing the build/test manually before merging, too. > > > So do you guys use the ghmerge script or own procedures? I'm curious.

Re: [openssl-project] build/test before merging

2018-05-23 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <25feb2a8-b363-443d-bae8-c47d1ad92...@akamai.com> on Wed, 23 May 2018 00:43:58 +, "Salz, Rich" said: rsalz> > I do the same, but I am reluctant having a script doing it for me using some fixed recipe... rsalz> rsalz> >I'm happy doing the build/test