On 2/10/20 6:29 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:19:20PM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/02/2020 00:15, SHANE LONTIS wrote:
>>> With the new architecture changes there are quite a few new calls to
>>>
>>> CRYPTO_UP_REF()
>>> CRYPTO_DOWN_REF()
>>>
>>> These methods
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:19:20PM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 10/02/2020 00:15, SHANE LONTIS wrote:
> > With the new architecture changes there are quite a few new calls to
> >
> > CRYPTO_UP_REF()
> > CRYPTO_DOWN_REF()
> >
> > These methods return an int that is not being checked in
On 10/02/2020 00:15, SHANE LONTIS wrote:
> With the new architecture changes there are quite a few new calls to
>
> CRYPTO_UP_REF()
> CRYPTO_DOWN_REF()
>
> These methods return an int that is not being checked in lots of places.
>
> This return value only seems to affect fallback code that
I've seen some projects enjoying https://github.com/apps/stale, though
its focus is not so much relabelling things that are ready, but
closing things that are not active, which might not be relevant here.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 2:23 AM Mark J Cox wrote:
>
> Okay, I'll leave things as they are
