+1
> On 4 Dec 2020, at 10:45 pm, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> Vote background
> ---
>
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
> component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text:
>
> For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following resolution
+1
Note I support also changing all key types to be able to operate without
the public component (where that is possible) which goes beyond what this
vote covers (as previously noted).
Having a documented conceptual model that is at odds with the code isn't a
good thing and in particular this choi
+1
Pauli
--
Dr Paul Dale | Distinguished Architect | Cryptographic Foundations
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
> On 4 Dec 2020, at 10:45 pm, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> Vote background
> ---
>
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
> compone
Vote background
---
The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text:
For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following resolution:
* relax the conceptual model to allow private keys to exist without
p
