#8765

#8765 has been sitting in an OTC hold state for a while and @DDvO has asked how it can be progressed. The PR is attempting to change the bnrand_range() function. Our existing code iterates (up to 100 times) and generates candidates which each have a

RE: OTC VOTE: Keeping API compatibility with missing public key

+1 > -Original Message- > From: openssl-project On Behalf Of Matt > Caswell > Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 10:46 AM > To: openssl-project@openssl.org > Subject: Re: OTC VOTE: Keeping API compatibility with missing public key > > +1 > > On 04/12/2020 12:45, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > Vote

Re: OTC VOTE: Keeping API compatibility with missing public key

+1 On 04/12/2020 12:45, Tomas Mraz wrote: > Vote background > --- > > The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public > component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text: > > For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following resolution: > * relax th

Re: OTC VOTE: Keeping API compatibility with missing public key

+1 On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:45:07 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > Vote background > --- > > The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public > component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text: > > For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following resolu