Vote: Add Release Requirements Policy
Topic: Add Release Requirements Policy at commit 1845646 This will become an official OTC policy. Proposed by: Tomas Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/pull/40 Public: yes Opened: 2022-05-25 Closed: Accepted: (for: , against: , abstained: , not voted: ) Dmitry [ ] Matt [ ] Pauli [ ] Tim [ ] Richard [ ] Shane [ ] Tomas [+1] Kurt [ ] Matthias [ ] Nicola [ ] OTC members, please vote, -- Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL
Vote: Add Branch Policy
I am sorry for sending a duplicate mail - this time with the correct Subject. Topic: Add Branch Policy at commit 10bea43 This will become an official OTC policy. Proposed by: Tomas Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/pull/7 Public: yes Opened: 2022-05-25 Closed: Accepted: (for: , against: , abstained: , not voted: ) Dmitry [ ] Matt [ ] Pauli [ ] Tim [ ] Richard [ ] Shane [ ] Tomas [+1] Kurt [ ] Matthias [ ] Nicola [ ] OTC members, please vote, -- Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL
Vote: coding-style.md: add various rules on names
Topic: Add Branch Policy at commit 10bea43 This will become an official OTC policy. Proposed by: Tomas Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/pull/7 Public: yes Opened: 2022-05-25 Closed: Accepted: (for: , against: , abstained: , not voted: ) Dmitry [ ] Matt [ ] Pauli [ ] Tim [ ] Richard [ ] Shane [ ] Tomas [+1] Kurt [ ] Matthias [ ] Nicola [ ] OTC members, please vote, -- Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL
Vote: coding-style.md: add various rules on names
Topic: coding-style.md: add various rules on names at commit 5a3b1ac This will become an official OTC policy. Proposed by: Tomas Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/pull/48 Public: yes Opened: 2022-05-25 Closed: Accepted: (for: , against: , abstained: , not voted: ) Dmitry [ ] Matt [ ] Pauli [ ] Tim [ ] Richard [ ] Shane [ ] Tomas [+1] Kurt [ ] Matthias [ ] Nicola [ ] OTC members, please vote, -- Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL
Re: HPKE PR process question
Hiya, On 25/05/2022 12:23, Matt Caswell wrote: Acknowledging receipt of this. We'll get back to you on it. Thanks. I'm happy to provide further info or be involved in the discussion if that's useful. An ETA for a substantive response would also be welcome (e.g. weeks, a month, ...) Cheers, S Matt On 23/05/2022 22:41, Stephen Farrell wrote: Hi, Back in November 2021 (~6 months ago) I created a PR [1] suggesting an implementation of RFC 9180. In discussion, the "need OMC decision" tag was added to the PR on Dec 14th. Since then, I have heard nothing at all and so far as I can see, from bits of the openssl-project list archive that I've checked, the OMC has had no discussion of this PR at all. So, now I'm wondering how to make process-progress with this PR - can you assist or point me at the correct place to ask? (I can start a thread on openssl-users I guess if that's better?) Please note that this is about trying to unblock the process - the details of HPKE APIs are separate. (I remain happy to do work to get my code in a shape that the project likes, but to be honest, 6 months of seeming process-blockage with no feedback is a tad de-motivating.) Thanks, Stephen. [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172 OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: HPKE PR process question
Acknowledging receipt of this. We'll get back to you on it. Matt On 23/05/2022 22:41, Stephen Farrell wrote: Hi, Back in November 2021 (~6 months ago) I created a PR [1] suggesting an implementation of RFC 9180. In discussion, the "need OMC decision" tag was added to the PR on Dec 14th. Since then, I have heard nothing at all and so far as I can see, from bits of the openssl-project list archive that I've checked, the OMC has had no discussion of this PR at all. So, now I'm wondering how to make process-progress with this PR - can you assist or point me at the correct place to ask? (I can start a thread on openssl-users I guess if that's better?) Please note that this is about trying to unblock the process - the details of HPKE APIs are separate. (I remain happy to do work to get my code in a shape that the project likes, but to be honest, 6 months of seeming process-blockage with no feedback is a tad de-motivating.) Thanks, Stephen. [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172
OMC VOTE: Update the security policy to include MODERATE issues in prenotifications.
The vote is as shown below. OMC members should cast their vote here: https://github.com/openssl/general-policies/pull/21 Mark Topic: Accept the security policy as of 314ef25aa50e6f0c6a5b026251a06a1c4941e5a2 Proposed by: Mark Cox Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/general-policies/pull/21 Public: yes Opened: 2022-05-25 Closed: -MM-DD Accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: W) Kurt [ ] Mark [ +1] Matt [ ] Pauli [ +1] Richard[ ] Tim[ ]
