On 29/03/18 11:06, Matt Caswell wrote:
> "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed
> during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members approve the change"
I started a vote with this text, and will report back here when I have
the results.
Matt
__
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <4e32b364-3ed3-9101-158c-09338f96e...@openssl.org> on Thu, 29 Mar
> 2018 11:06:46 +0100, Matt Caswell said:
>
> matt> How about this for the vote text:
> matt>
> matt> "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLS
>"Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed
during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members approve the change"
Fine. Please run the vote soon as there is not much time.
___
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-pr
In message <4e32b364-3ed3-9101-158c-09338f96e...@openssl.org> on Thu, 29 Mar
2018 11:06:46 +0100, Matt Caswell said:
matt> How about this for the vote text:
matt>
matt> "Feature changes in 1.1.1 directly related to TLSv1.3 will be allowed
matt> during the beta as long as at least 3 OMC members
On 27/03/18 17:07, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 27/03/18 14:00, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> Discussion seems to have stalled out on this. Please review
>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary.
>>
>>
>>
>> Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy?
>
> I thin
On 27/03/18 14:00, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Discussion seems to have stalled out on this. Please review
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary.
>
>
>
> Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy?
I think that is ok and doesn't stray too far from what we sai
Discussion seems to have stalled out on this. Please review
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5702 if necessary.
Do folks want a general “TLS 1.3 is okay post-freeze” policy? I don’t know, but
I think it will take too long to get to a decision. Is anyone (on the OMC)
going to take that
