ct@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-project] OID policy
On 14/03/18 23:40, Paul Dale wrote:
>> We should have OID's for the things we implement
>
> Sounds like a policy :)
> Vote time?
In the past we've also put in OIDs on request (i.e. not necessarily for
somethi
On 14/03/18 23:40, Paul Dale wrote:
>> We should have OID's for the things we implement
>
> Sounds like a policy :)
> Vote time?
In the past we've also put in OIDs on request (i.e. not necessarily for
something we implement) if someone has given a reasonable argument for
its inclusion.
Matt
_
In message <20180315.090502.2143972695067215526.levi...@openssl.org> on Thu, 15
Mar 2018 09:05:02 +0100 (CET), Richard Levitte said:
levitte> So can I assume there's a PR coming up?
Ah, saw it!
--
Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levi
In message <6f9a7c53-f40f-4794-bf1a-f59eb1db6d4b@default> on Wed, 14 Mar 2018
16:40:24 -0700 (PDT), Paul Dale said:
paul.dale> > We should have OID's for the things we implement
paul.dale>
paul.dale> Sounds like a policy :)
paul.dale> Vote time?
Not sure if there's a need for a vote. I'll jus
> We should have OID's for the things we implement
Sounds like a policy :)
Vote time?
Pauli
--
Oracle
Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
___
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project
No there is no policy. We should have OID's for the things we implement (
On 3/14/18, 6:28 PM, "Paul Dale" wrote:
Is there a policy about filling in missing OIDs in objects.txt?
I noticed that AES-128-XTS is in objects.txt but doesn't include an OID
even though the IEEE Security
Is there a policy about filling in missing OIDs in objects.txt?
I noticed that AES-128-XTS is in objects.txt but doesn't include an OID even
though the IEEE Security in Storage Working Group has defined one.
Pauli
--
Oracle
Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption
Phone +61